[Wannier] why hopping parameters of equivalent WF is different
Lin Xie
experiencemaik at gmail.com
Fri Jun 7 09:36:52 CEST 2013
Dear all
I am calculating the hopping parameters of monolayer and bulk MoS2 using
Wannier90. I have got good convergence of the MLWF basis for both cases.
The Hamiltonian in WF basis for the monolayer is fine and the matrix
element (hopping parameters) looks like:
0 0 0 1 1 -7.812224 0.000000
0 0 0 2 1 0.378757 0.000000
0 0 0 3 1 -0.161374 0.000000
0 0 0 4 1 0.378757 0.000000
0 0 0 5 1 0.378757 0.000000
0 0 0 6 1 -0.161374 0.000000
0 0 0 7 1 0.378757 0.000000
There are three WFs for each S atom (2 S atoms in total) and one WFs for Mo
atom. From this table it is clear that the hopping parameters for
equivalent hoppings (e.g. hopping from WF 2 to WF 1 and hopping from WF 4
to WF 1) are identical.
However, for the bulk MoS2, I got the following hopping parameters:
0 0 0 1 1 6.788221 0.000000
0 0 0 2 1 0.002303 0.000000
0 0 0 3 1 0.167082 0.000000
0 0 0 4 1 -0.375031 0.000000
0 0 0 5 1 0.374977 0.000000
0 0 0 6 1 0.167082 0.000000
0 0 0 7 1 -0.375031 0.000000
0 0 0 8 1 0.374977 0.000000
0 0 0 9 1 -0.000013 0.000000
0 0 0 10 1 0.000201 0.000000
0 0 0 11 1 -0.000201 0.000000
0 0 0 12 1 -0.010587 0.000000
0 0 0 13 1 -0.005480 0.000000
0 0 0 14 1 0.005477 0.000000
What puzzles me is that now I get a complete different hopping parameters
for equivalent hoppings, e.g. hopping from WF 4 to WF 1 and that from WF 5
to WF 1. I have try many possible sets of initial projections but they give
similar results. Could some one help if my understand of the Hamiltonian in
WF basis is incorrect.
Best regards!
--
Lin Xie
Beijing National Center for Electron Microscopy
Department of Material Science and Engineering
Tsinghua University
Beijing, PR of China
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/wannier/attachments/20130607/a142a458/attachment.html>
More information about the Wannier
mailing list