[QE-users] Total and absolute magnetization not converging to the same value
a.pramos
a.pramos at alumnos.upm.es
Thu Jul 20 10:48:38 CEST 2023
Dear users,
I'm performing a relaxation of and Ir doped Ni(OH)2 101 slab, having
built it from a previously relaxed 3x3x3 supercell. I am fixing all
atoms but those on the surface to make convergence faster, but still, I
am getting trouble converging it due to the divergence between total and
absolute magnetization. The total magnetic moment per unit cell of
Ni(OH)2 is 2 uB, having Ni two unpaired electrons.
My calculations on the 3x3x3 Ni(OH)2 supercell were performed setting
the total magnetization to 54, but applying that same value to the
calculations with the slab caused the absolute magnetization to diverge
past that value, making convergence impossible. Changing the
tot_magnetization value to that indicated by absolute magnetization
caused the same problem to be repeated with an even bigger value. For
this reason, I decided to first perform a relaxation with smearing
occupations to obtain the objective magnetization value and then
applying it to the actual calculation with fixed, but still there is no
way for it to converge. Starting magnetization are set to 0 for O and H,
and 1 for Ni and Ir.
Please find attached one of my inputs and outputs.
Best wishes,
Álvaro
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: betaNiOHIrsup101smearing2.out
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20230720/4f16247b/attachment.ksh>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: betaNiOHIrsup101smearing2.in
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20230720/4f16247b/attachment-0001.ksh>
More information about the users
mailing list