[QE-users] occupation=smearing and magnetic moment

mkondrin mkondrin at hppi.troitsk.ru
Thu Apr 15 13:41:26 CEST 2021


On 15.04.2021 15:23, Evgeny Permyakov wrote:
> Dear QE users! I found that the calculated magnetic moment of the minimal
> cell of LaFe4P12  depends on whether I use occupations=smearing,
> specifically I get magnetisation about 2.7 Bohr/cell for occupations=fixed
> and zero magnetisation for occupations=smearing. Is it normal? Why does it
> even happen? What result is the more 'correct' one?
>
> The system is suspected to be a Pauli paramagnet, does this fact mess
> somehow the calculation and how should I approach modeling it?
>
> I added the minimal input file to reproduce the behaviour.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
> users mailing list users at lists.quantum-espresso.org
> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hi, Evgeny!

This can happen if you choose large smearing parameter. So the smearing 
is larger than the energy splitting induced by magnetization. Try to 
decrease degauss value.

Yours,
M. V. Kondrin


More information about the users mailing list