[QE-users] Pseudo potential
Pietro Delugas
pdelugas at sissa.it
Mon Aug 31 13:20:09 CEST 2020
Yes Occupation Numbers. For each k-point are first printed all the
computed eigenvalues and then occupation for each KS state.
On 31/08/20 11:57, Yuvam Bhateja wrote:
> Dr. Pietro,
>
> Sorry for putting another question in a thread.
> When you said fractional occupation, from where are you reading the data?
>
> Are you saying on the basis of data written below
> "k = 0.0000 0.0000-1.0000 ( 4508 PWs) bands (ev):"
> or the "Occupation numbers."
>
> I apologize in advance if it is a stupid question, I am very new in DFT.
>
> Regards
> Yuvam Bhateja
>
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2020, 1:47 pm Pietro Delugas, <pdelugas at sissa.it
> <mailto:pdelugas at sissa.it>> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> from the results of your calculation you have fractional
> occupations. Does the literature report this material as
> insulator or as metal ?
>
> It might be that this fractional occupations are caused by the
> wrong dispersion of the some atomic states. This a very well known
> problem of LDA or PBE with localized d or f atomic states. One way
> to correct this behavior is using LDA+U approach.
>
> I hope this helps
>
> regards
>
> Pietro
>
> On 31/08/20 09:46, tanmay chaki wrote:
>> Dear sir,
>> As your suggestions I have changed the required things. But I got
>> total magnetization zero. but this compound has a magnetic moment
>> which is reported in the journal. I have attached the input and
>> output file. please help me to do correct calculations.
>> Thanking you.
>>
>> Tanmay Chaki
>> Research Scholar
>> N.B.U
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 11:16 PM tanmay chaki
>> <tanmaychaki at gmail.com <mailto:tanmaychaki at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for your suggestions
>>
>> On Fri, 28 Aug, 2020, 10:43 pm Yuvam Bhateja,
>> <yuvamb16 at gmail.com <mailto:yuvamb16 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> As per my knowledge, there's no specific pseudopotential
>> for spin calculation.
>>
>> You need to use commands like nspin and
>> starting_magnetization in order to start your spin
>> calculation.
>>
>> Your choice of XC Functional can affect the results in
>> your spin calculation.
>>
>> Let me know if it helps.
>>
>> Regards
>> Yuvam Bhateja
>>
>> On Fri, 28 Aug 2020, 10:38 pm tanmay chaki,
>> <tanmaychaki at gmail.com <mailto:tanmaychaki at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello QE users,
>> Is there any specific Pseudo potential for spin
>> polarized calculation?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX
>> (www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso
>> <http://www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso>)
>> users mailing list users at lists.quantum-espresso.org
>> <mailto:users at lists.quantum-espresso.org>
>> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX
>> (www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso
>> <http://www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso>)
>> users mailing list users at lists.quantum-espresso.org
>> <mailto:users at lists.quantum-espresso.org>
>> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso <http://www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso>)
>> users mailing listusers at lists.quantum-espresso.org <mailto:users at lists.quantum-espresso.org>
>> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> _______________________________________________
> Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX
> (www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso
> <http://www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso>)
> users mailing list users at lists.quantum-espresso.org
> <mailto:users at lists.quantum-espresso.org>
> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20200831/58473b12/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list