[QE-users] How can I reproduce correct phonon frequencies ?
Atsushi Yamada
ayamada224 at gmail.com
Fri Apr 26 10:15:39 CEST 2019
Hi,
I'm beginner of QE (just I started to use it from a week ago) and I'm
facing a problem that my calculations do not reproduce correct phonon
frequencies. My material is 4H-SiC which is popular and well studied. I
want to reproduce phonon frequencies at gamma point shown in Fig.2(b) of
the following paper:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.02634.pdf
It tells that the phonon dispersion in the figure is calculated by Quantum
Espresso v 5.4.0 and calculation conditions are given. I calculated with
the same conditions, but the high phonon frequencies region are not good
agreement. I tried many calculations with various options and parameters,
but I couldn't get good agreement, and now, I have no idea to solve it. My
resultant frequencies at the gamma point are:
# mode [cm-1] [THz] IR
1 -0.00 -0.0000 0.0000
2 -0.00 -0.0000 0.0000
3 0.00 0.0000 0.0000
4 192.54 5.7721 0.0000
5 192.54 5.7721 0.0000
6 200.76 6.0186 0.0000
7 200.76 6.0186 0.0000
8 259.89 7.7914 0.0015
9 259.89 7.7914 0.0015
10 404.77 12.1347 0.0000
11 412.80 12.3755 0.0000
12 613.53 18.3931 0.1675
13 785.34 23.5439 0.0320
14 785.34 23.5439 0.0320
15 793.13 23.7774 0.0000
16 793.13 23.7774 0.0000
17 795.96 23.8622 85.2162
18 801.09 24.0162 0.0000
19 801.09 24.0162 0.0000
20 811.70 24.3343 80.2329
21 811.70 24.3343 80.2329
22 851.64 25.5315 0.3206
23 926.17 27.7658 0.0000
24 935.31 28.0398 0.0000
Especially, modes 20-24 are obviously different from the paper (and other
literature): The paper is like, (probably) frequencies of the modes 22 and
23 are close (but my result is not like that) and modes 20 and 21 are not
degenerated (but my result shows degeneracy). The results of my
calculations did not change if I use other options, thresholds and
pseudopotential.
Maybe relating to this problem, my cell size obtained by geometry
optimization is not the same to the values shown in the paper (3.07A,
10.05A in Table 1 of the paper).
My input files and calculations are as followings:
(now, I used latest version of QE, 6.4.1, but result by QE 5.4 was the same)
(1) geometry optimization:
pw.x -in ./SiC.opt.in > ./SiC.opt.out
(2) SCF calculation:
pw.x -in ./SiC.scf.in > ./SiC.scf.out
(3) Phonon calculation
ph.x -in ./SiC.phG.in > ./SiC.phG.out
(4) Dynamical matrix calculation
dynmat.x < SiC.dynmat.in > SiC.dynmat.out
Input files:
[1] SiC.opt.in
&control
calculation='vc-relax'
prefix='SiC',
pseudo_dir = './pseudo/',
outdir='./tmp/'
etot_conv_thr=1d-7
forc_conv_thr=1d-7
/
&system
ibrav= 4,
A= 3.0760,
C= 10.0400,
nat= 8,
ntyp= 2,
ecutwfc = 60.0,
ecutrho =240
/
&electrons
conv_thr = 1.0d-10
/
&ions
ion_dynamics='bfgs'
/
&cell
cell_dofree='ibrav'
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
Si 28.086 Si.pz-n-nc.UPF
C 12.0107 C.pz-nc.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS angstrom
Si 0.00000000 1.77592943 2.51000000
C 0.00000000 1.77592943 4.39250000
Si 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00000000
C 0.00000000 0.00000000 1.88250000
Si 1.53800000 0.88796471 7.53000000
C 1.53800000 0.88796471 9.41250000
Si 0.00000000 0.00000000 5.02000000
C 0.00000000 0.00000000 6.90250000
K_POINTS automatic
8 8 4 0 0 0
------------------------
[2] SiC.scf.in
&control
calculation='scf'
prefix='SiC',
pseudo_dir = './pseudo/',
outdir='./tmp/'
/
&system
ibrav= 4,
A= 3.04337366, !<-- obtained from the optimization
C= 9.96163727, !<-- obtained from the optimization
nat= 8,
ntyp= 2,
ecutwfc = 60.0,
ecutrho =240
/
&electrons
conv_thr = 1.0d-10
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
Si 28.086 Si.pz-n-nc.UPF
C 12.0107 C.pz-nc.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS angstrom
Si 0.000000000 1.757092472 2.489491419
C 0.000000000 1.757092472 4.362543288
Si 0.000000000 -0.000000000 -0.001538102
C -0.000000000 -0.000000000 1.865935344
Si 1.521686716 0.878546231 7.470309676
C 1.521686716 0.878546231 9.343361545
Si -0.000000000 0.000000000 4.979280155
C -0.000000000 0.000000000 6.846753601
K_POINTS automatic
8 8 4 0 0 0
-------------------------
[3] SiC.phG.in
Phonons of SiC at Gamma
&inputph
tr2_ph=1.0d-16,
prefix='SiC',
outdir='./tmp'
fildyn='SiC.dynG',
epsil=.true.
/
0.0 0.0 0.0
-------------------------
[4] SiC.dynmat.in
&input
fildyn='SiC.dynG',
asr='simple'
/
------------------------
What is wrong...?
I'm so glad if you kindly help me.
best,
Atsushi Yamada
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20190426/232e0b82/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list