[Pw_forum] odd number of electrons and magnetization
FARAH MARSUSI
marsusi at aut.ac.ir
Mon Jan 16 12:38:11 CET 2017
Dear Giovanni,
Many thanks for your quick response. I have attached the out file but, because of its large size, it was not sent to forum.
By experiment 1Bm is expected, at which this should also lead to opening of a gap at Gamma point (about 0.5 eV). This latter also has not
been achieved by PBE and PBE0.
However, if impose total
magnetization of 1 to the system, every things will go well.
nqx
variables larger than one,
at least by me, were not possible. Perhaps, q vectors go outside the BZ.
Therefore, I used a dense k-mesh to compensate this problem.
The input file is attached, and here are some important parts of out file.
EXX: now go back to refine exchange calculation
total cpu time spent up to now is 3191.8 secs
Self-consistent Calculation
iteration # 1 ecut= 80.00 Ry beta=0.70
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
ethr = 2.01E-09, avg # of iterations = 8.7
total cpu time spent up to now is 39050.3 secs
total energy = -252.24700782 Ry
Harris-Foulkes estimate = -268.54994708 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00581274 Ry
total magnetization = 0.13 Bohr mag/cell
absolute magnetization = 0.20 Bohr mag/cell
and for Fock part of calculations:
iteration # 1 ecut= 80.00 Ry beta=0.70
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
ethr = 1.19E-10, avg # of iterations = 4.6
total cpu time spent up to now is 250240.0 secs
total energy = -252.26244594 Ry
Harris-Foulkes estimate = -268.59859464 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00000103 Ry
By experiment 1Bm is expected, on which this will also
result in opening of a gap in Gamma point. This latter also has not
been achieved by PBE and PBE0. However, if impose the total
magnetization to 1, every things go well.
The end of the attached
out file is crashed by the sudden lost of power, which is not important
and enough data have been obtained.
nqx variables larger than one,
at least by me, were not possible. Perhaps, q vectors go outside the BZ.
Therefor, I used a dense k-mesh to compensate this problem.
Here is some important parts of out files:
.
.
.
EXX: setup a grid of 21 q-points centered on each k-point
(k+q)-points:
0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000 1 1
0.0000000 0.1443376 0.0000000 2 1
0.0000000 0.2886751 0.0000000 3 1
0.0000000 0.4330127 0.0000000 4 1
0.0000000 -0.5773503 0.0000000 5 1
0.1250000 0.2165064 0.0000000 6 1
0.1250000 0.3608439 0.0000000 7 1
0.1250000 0.5051815 0.0000000 8 1
0.2500000 0.4330127 0.0000000 9 1
0.2500000 0.5773503 0.0000000 10 1
-0.1250000 0.0721688 0.0000000 11 1
-0.2500000 0.1443376 0.0000000 12 1
-0.3750000 0.2165064 0.0000000 13 1
0.5000000 -0.2886751 0.0000000 14 1
-0.1250000 0.2165064 0.0000000 15 1
-0.1250000 0.3608439 0.0000000 16 1
-0.2500000 0.2886751 0.0000000 17 1
-0.1250000 0.5051815 0.0000000 18 1
-0.3750000 0.3608439 0.0000000 19 1
-0.2500000 0.4330127 0.0000000 20 1
-0.3750000 0.5051815 0.0000000 21 1
PseudoPot. # 1 for C read from file:
/home/marsusi/local/qe-6.0/work/graphene/hybrid/C.pbe-hgh.UPF
MD5 check sum: 0e67d267521f6aebc6a2c9accb749a71
Pseudo is Norm-conserving, Zval = 4.0
Generated in analytical, separable form
Using radial grid of 1073 points, 1 beta functions with:
l(1) = 0
PseudoPot. # 2 for F read from file:
/home/marsusi/local/qe-6.0/work/graphene/hybrid/F.pbe-hgh.UPF
MD5 check sum: 7c8d7aa99b986d59a5bb8f3e2f4f4241
Pseudo is Norm-conserving, Zval = 7.0
Generated in analytical, separable form
Using radial grid of 1105 points, 1 beta functions with:
l(1) = 0
atomic species valence mass pseudopotential
C 4.00 12.01100 C( 1.00)
F 7.00 18.99000 F( 1.00)
Starting magnetic structure
atomic species magnetization
C 0.000
F 1.000
2 Sym. Ops. (no inversion) found
total magnetization = 0.19 Bohr mag/cell
absolute magnetization = 0.23 Bohr mag/cell
iteration # 2 ecut= 80.00 Ry beta=0.70
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
ethr = 1.31E-09, avg # of iterations = 3.9
total cpu time spent up to now is 257285.4 secs
total energy = -252.26244618 Ry
Harris-Foulkes estimate = -268.59859485 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 0.00000174 Ry
total magnetization = 0.19 Bohr mag/cell
absolute magnetization = 0.23 Bohr mag/cell
iteration # 3 ecut= 80.00 Ry beta=0.70
Davidson diagonalization with overlap
ethr = 1.31E-09, avg # of iterations = 3.0
Magnetic moment per site:
atom: 1 charge: 1.6566 magn: 0.0057 constr: 0.0000
atom: 2 charge: 1.6538 magn: 0.0061 constr: 0.0000
atom: 3 charge: 1.6487 magn: 0.0100 constr: 0.0000
atom: 4 charge: 1.6581 magn: 0.0004 constr: 0.0000
atom: 5 charge: 1.6565 magn: 0.0005 constr: 0.0000
atom: 6 charge: 1.6496 magn: -0.0047 constr: 0.0000
atom: 7 charge: 1.6487 magn: 0.0100 constr: 0.0000
atom: 8 charge: 1.6523 magn: 0.0091 constr: 0.0000
atom: 9 charge: 1.6471 magn: 0.0078 constr: 0.0000
atom: 10 charge: 1.6564 magn: 0.0008 constr: 0.0000
atom: 11 charge: 1.5643 magn: -0.0014 constr: 0.0000
atom: 12 charge: 1.6565 magn: 0.0005 constr: 0.0000
atom: 13 charge: 1.6538 magn: 0.0061 constr: 0.0000
atom: 14 charge: 1.6516 magn: 0.0066 constr: 0.0000
atom: 15 charge: 1.6523 magn: 0.0091 constr: 0.0000
atom: 16 charge: 1.6603 magn: -0.0035 constr: 0.0000
atom: 17 charge: 1.6564 magn: 0.0008 constr: 0.0000
atom: 18 charge: 1.6581 magn: 0.0004 constr: 0.0000
atom: 19 charge: 5.2516 magn: 0.0089 constr: 0.0000
k = 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ( 77531 PWs) bands (ev):
-31.0291 -25.1365 -22.4376 -22.4359 -22.4292 -22.3251 -22.3225 -22.1038
-17.7312 -17.6872 -17.6362 -17.6326 -15.2699 -15.2695 -14.6553 -14.4429
-14.4422 -14.3799 -14.3366 -14.3349 -12.0876 -10.9781 -10.6455 -10.6420
-10.3364 -10.2964 -10.2963 -10.2244 -8.8573 -8.8543 -8.4620 -8.3201
-8.3196 -7.8682 -7.8673 -7.1793 -7.1791 -6.2411 -1.8047 -1.7177
-1.7168 -0.3094 1.2814
total cpu time spent up to now is 263237.4 secs
End of self-consistent calculation
Best regards,
F. Marsusi,
Assistant Professor,
Department of Physics,
Amirkabir University of Technology.
On Mon, 01/16/2017 01:41 PM, Giovanni Cantele <giovanni.cantele at spin.cnr.it> wrote:
> Maybe it is worth providing: i) output file, to have a look to the results ; ii) full input file, to understand whether there is some input-related issue; iii) what are the experimental results you expect to reproduce with QE.
> Based on the only information included in your message, it can be difficult to provide an answer. Are you sure about the choice of the nqx variables? What is the value of the magnetisation at PBE level? I would firstinvestigate the latter, before moving to the PBE0 calculation.
> Giovanni
>
> > On 16 Jan 2017, at 10:33, FARAH MARSUSI <marsusi at aut.ac.ir> wrote:
> Dear QE users,
>
> The total magnetization of the system consist of one fluorine adatom on the graphene sheet in a 3 by 3 supercell obtained by both PBE and PBE0 is nearly zero. No fix magnetization imposed to system, in spite of the odd number of electrons, and let it to be determined during the self-consistent cycles.
> This result is inconsistent with experiments.
>
> ibrav = 4,
> celldm(1) = 13.999489019,
> celldm(3) = 2.7,
> nat = 19,
> ntyp = 2,
> ecutwfc = 80 ,
> nbnd = 43,
> input_dft = 'PBE0' ,
> occupations = 'smearing' ,
> degauss = 0.02 ,
> smearing = 'gaussian' ,
> nspin = 2 ,
> starting_magnetization(2) = 1.0,
> exxdiv_treatment = 'gygi-baldereschi' ,
> x_gamma_extrapolation = .false. ,
> nqx1 = 1 ,
> nqx2 = 1 ,
> nqx3 = 1 ,
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> F. Marsusi,
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
--
Giovanni Cantele, PhD
CNR-SPIN
c/o Dipartimento di Fisica
Universita' di Napoli "Federico II"
Complesso Universitario M. S. Angelo - Ed. 6
Via Cintia, I-80126, Napoli, Italy
e-mail: giovanni.cantele at spin.cnr.it
Phone: +39 081 676910
Skype contact: giocan74
ResearcherID: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/A-1951-2009
Web page: http://people.na.infn.it/~cantele
--
This email was Anti Virus checked by Astaro Security Gateway. http://www.sophos.com
_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum at pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170116/e73e6b81/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: grap.in
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 2497 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170116/e73e6b81/attachment.obj>
More information about the users
mailing list