[Pw_forum] Version 5.2.1 for the PP program

[Filippo Spiga]

Dear Natalie,

which version of intel compiler? We need to track these information to fix backward compatibility and increase our testing coverage. Anyway, if needed I can generate a patch to revert only these specific issue within the next 24h.

--
Mr. Filippo SPIGA, M.Sc.
Quantum ESPRESSO Foundation
http://fspiga.github.io ~ skype: filippo.spiga

*****
Disclaimer: "Please note this message and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. The contents are not to be disclosed to anyone other than the addressee. Unauthorized recipients are requested to preserve this confidentiality and to advise the sender immediately of any error in transmission."

> On Sep 27, 2015, at 11:55 PM, Holzwarth, Natalie <natalie at wfu.edu> wrote:
> 
> In testing the new 5.2.1 version of the program, I noticed that one change from 5.1 was in the partial density of states output from partialdos.f90 for the title line.
> 
> For example, in version 5.1, the title line for the pdos output used
> WRITE(4,'(" pdos(E)   ",$)')
> 
> while in version 5.2.1 the same pdos output is changed to
> WRITE(4,'(" pdos(E)   "), advance="NO"')
> 
> For our intel compiler, the 5.1 version keeps the title line on a single line, while the 5.2.1 version puts each piece of the title line on a different line.   I guess it is not processing the  advance="NO" statement.    Since this title line is making the postprocessing difficult, I am tempted to put those write statements back to the 5.1 version, or perhaps there is a better solution.    Thanks in advance for your advice on this.       Natalie
> 
> N. A. W. Holzwarth                                       email: natalie at wfu.edu
> Department of Physics                                  web: http://www.wfu.edu/~natalie
> Wake Forest University                                 phone: 1-336-758-5510 
> Winston-Salem, NC 27109 USA                     office: Rm. 300 Olin Physical Lab
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum