[Pw_forum] What happens at REALLY large ectuwfc?
Brad Malone
brad.malone at gmail.com
Sun Jan 24 23:38:01 CET 2010
>are you using the latest cvs version? apparently there is a problem
>with the new symmetrization algorithm that will be fixed ASAP.
The results I posted are from espresso-4.0.5, although I originally saw this
problem with espresso-4.1.1 in a different system (AlAs on a 2x2x2 shifted
grid).
As for what Lorenzo said, it makes sense with what I'm seeing. The energy
breakdowns for the 200 Ry and the 2000 Ry cases are shown below:
For 200 Ry:
--------------------------------
! total energy = -14.59208467 Ry
Harris-Foulkes estimate = -14.59208467 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 3.9E-11 Ry
The total energy is the sum of the following terms:
one-electron contribution = 5.58227319 Ry
hartree contribution = 1.67255719 Ry
xc contribution = -5.04795028 Ry
ewald contribution = -16.79896478 Ry
Fock energy 1 = 0.00000000 Ry
Fock energy 2 = 0.00000000 Ry
Half Fock energy 2 = 0.00000000 Ry
-------------------------
For 2000 Ry:
-------------------------
! total energy = -14.11008918 Ry
Harris-Foulkes estimate = -14.11008918 Ry
estimated scf accuracy < 1.0E-11 Ry
The total energy is the sum of the following terms:
one-electron contribution = 6.07256114 Ry
hartree contribution = 1.58024935 Ry
xc contribution = -4.96393489 Ry
ewald contribution = -16.79896478 Ry
Fock energy 1 = 0.00000000 Ry
Fock energy 2 = 0.00000000 Ry
Half Fock energy 2 = 0.00000000 Ry
-------------------
So you can see the one-electron contribution going up and the hartree
contribution going down as Lorenzo as argued.
Brad
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100124/059131a8/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list