[Pw_forum] GGA+U
ali kazempour
kazempoor2000 at yahoo.com
Wed Jul 29 18:22:40 CEST 2009
Dear all
>From Linear response calculation ,I get for TiO2 bulk U=5.73, But when I double the unit cell in z direction and again compute U ,I get three different value for Ti atoms.(U=5.63,5.46,5.70).
Why these values are not same . what is the main reason? Does it in numerical variation errors?
ANother question:
When we perturb D level by alpha, it give rise to change in d occupancy . Is it correct that if we impose negative alpha , the occupation becomes less than initial state .?
for Ti isolated atom for apha=0.1 tr[ns(na)] after first-iteration equal to the 0.002 and at the end of calculation is 2.327 while we know that for Ti, tr[ns(na)] =2.000. Does it seems to be correct.?
Number of iteration with fixed ns = 0
Starting ns and Hubbard U :
enter write_ns
U( 1) = 0.0000
alpha( 1) = 0.1000
atom 1 Tr[ns(na)]= 2.0000000
atom 1 spin 1
eigenvalues: 0.4000000 0.4000000 0.4000000 0.4000000 0.4000000
eigenvectors
1 1.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000
2 0.0000000 1.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000
3 0.0000000 0.0000000 1.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000
4 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000 1.0000000 0.0000000
5 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000 1.0000000
occupations
0.400 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.400 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.400 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.400 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.400
atom 1 spin 2
eigenvalues: 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000
eigenvectors
1 1.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000
2 0.0000000 1.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000
3 0.0000000 0.0000000 1.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000
4 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000 1.0000000 0.0000000
5 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000 0.0000000 1.0000000
occupations
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
nsum = 2.0000000
exit write_ns
Atomic wfc used for LDA+U Projector are NOT orthogonalized
Starting wfc are 9 atomic + 1 random wfc
total cpu time spent up to now is 13.34 secs
per-process dynamical memory: 326.3 Mb
Self-consistent Calculation
iteration # 1 ecut= 45.00 Ry beta=0.70
CG style diagonalization
c_bands: 3 eigenvalues not converged
c_bands: 2 eigenvalues not converged
ethr = 1.00E-12, avg # of iterations = 40.4
enter write_ns
U( 1) = 0.0000
alpha( 1) = 0.1000
atom 1 Tr[ns(na)]= 0.0021401
atom 1 spin 1
eigenvalues: 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0009883 0.0009883
eigenvectors
1 0.0000000 -0.8803392 -0.4743427 0.0000000 0.0013927
2 0.0000000 -0.4743432 0.8803400 0.0000000 -0.0000040
3 0.0000000 0.0012242 0.0006642 0.0000000 0.9999990
4 -0.8886820 0.0000000 0.0000000 -0.4585240 0.0000000
5 0.4585240 0.0000000 0.0000000 -0.8886820 0.0000000
occupations
0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
---------------------------------- and end of the file is
:
End of self-consistent calculation
enter write_ns
U( 1) = 0.0000
alpha( 1) = 0.1000
atom 1 Tr[ns(na)]= 2.3270531
atom 1 spin 1
eigenvalues: 0.1574294 0.1574294 0.1574294 0.9273825 0.9273825
eigenvectors
1 0.0000000 -0.4359030 -0.7986559 0.0000000 0.4148945
2 0.0000000 0.7269732 -0.0406891 0.0000000 0.6854592
3 0.0000000 -0.5305643 0.6004109 0.0000000 0.5983379
4 -0.9258933 0.0000000 0.0000000 -0.3777851 0.0000000
5 0.3777851 0.0000000 0.0000000 -0.9258933 0.0000000
occupations
0.927 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.157 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.157 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.927 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.157
Thanks a lot
Ali Kazempour
Physics department, Isfahan University of Technology
84156 Isfahan, Iran. Tel-1: +98 311 391 3733
Fax: +98 311 391 2376 Tel-2: +98 311 391 2375
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20090729/6b146538/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list