[Pw_forum] Error in Espresso post-installation Test examples

[Axel Kohlmeyer]

On Sat, 1 Nov 2008, D.A. Tompsett wrote:

DT> Dear Alex and All,
DT>                 thanks for the help. I understand better what the
DT> "read_namelists : error" is now. I am using mpif90 for my compiler on a unix
DT> platform.

sorry, but this is like answering "i have a red sedan car" when being 
asked about model and make. what _kind_ of unix and what compiler vendor
and version do you have. mpif90 is usually a wrapper and can "contain"
any compiler.

try running "mpif90 -v"  and/or "mpif90 -showme" to get some hints of 
the compiler and send in the output.
and try running "uname -a" to get some info about the kind of unix.

thanks,
   axel.


[...]
DT> I also paste below all of the warnings sent to stderr during the compile. I
DT> am not sure if they are related to my problem:
DT> 
DT> fortcom: Warning: iotk_stream.spp, line 54: A dummy argument with an
DT> explicit INTENT(OUT) declaration is not given an explicit value. [VAL]
DT> subroutine
DT> iotk_stream_read_LOGICAL1(unit,header,val,setpos,getpos,noval,ierr)
DT> -------------------------------------------------^ fortcom: Warning:
DT> iotk_stream.spp, line 54: A dummy argument with an explicit INTENT(OUT)
DT> declaration is not given an explicit value. [VAL] subroutine
DT> iotk_stream_read_INTEGER1(unit,header,val,setpos,getpos,noval,ierr)
DT> -------------------------------------------------^ fortcom: Warning:
DT> iotk_stream.spp, line 54: A dummy argument with an explicit INTENT(OUT)
DT> declaration is not given an explicit value. [VAL] subroutine
DT> iotk_stream_read_REAL1(unit,header,val,setpos,getpos,noval,ierr)
DT> ----------------------------------------------^ fortcom: Warning:
DT> iotk_stream.spp, line 54: A dummy argument with an explicit INTENT(OUT)
DT> declaration is not given an explicit value. [VAL] subroutine
DT> iotk_stream_read_REAL2(unit,header,val,setpos,getpos,noval,ierr)
DT> ----------------------------------------------^ fortcom: Warning:
DT> iotk_stream.spp, line 54: A dummy argument with an explicit INTENT(OUT)
DT> declaration is not given an explicit value. [VAL] subroutine
DT> iotk_stream_read_COMPLEX1(unit,header,val,setpos,getpos,noval,ierr)
DT> -------------------------------------------------^ fortcom: Warning:
DT> iotk_stream.spp, line 54: A dummy argument with an explicit INTENT(OUT)
DT> declaration is not given an explicit value. [VAL] subroutine
DT> iotk_stream_read_COMPLEX2(unit,header,val,setpos,getpos,noval,ierr)
DT> -------------------------------------------------^ fortcom: Warning:
DT> iotk_stream.spp, line 54: A dummy argument with an explicit INTENT(OUT)
DT> declaration is not given an explicit value. [VAL] subroutine
DT> iotk_stream_read_CHARACTER1(unit,header,val,setpos,getpos,noval,ierr)
DT> ---------------------------------------------------^ ar: creating libiotk.a
DT> fftw.c(27449): warning #188: enumerated type mixed with another type
DT>  	  EXPECT_INT(dir);
DT>  	  ^
DT> 
DT> fftw.c(27450): warning #188: enumerated type mixed with another type
DT>  	  EXPECT_INT(type);
DT> 
DT> 
DT> Please let me know if you can see how I might fix this eg. by altering the
DT> input file to make the namelist reader happy.
DT> 
DT> Thanks for any help,
DT> David.
DT> 

-- 
=======================================================================
Axel Kohlmeyer   akohlmey at cmm.chem.upenn.edu   http://www.cmm.upenn.edu
   Center for Molecular Modeling   --   University of Pennsylvania
Department of Chemistry, 231 S.34th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6323
tel: 1-215-898-1582,  fax: 1-215-573-6233,  office-tel: 1-215-898-5425
=======================================================================
If you make something idiot-proof, the universe creates a better idiot.