[Pw_forum] relax question
Xunlei Ding
ding at sissa.it
Sun Jul 15 11:29:03 CEST 2007
Hi,
In the vasp forum, one set the parameter like this:
EDIFF: 1E-07
EDIFFG: -0.0005
And in the reply it is said, "Anyways, your ediffg is very low. A strict force
criteria is -0.001, and many people would use -0.01 or higher. If you look at
the change in the energy as you go from a force of 0.01 eV/Ang to 0.001 eV/Ang,
it is usually negligible."
You can check the difference of results when you set force_conv_thr as 1.d-3 and
1.d-4. If the difference is negligible, why use too strict threshold?
Yours,
Ding Xunlei
Quoting xu yuehua <njuxuyuehua at gmail.com>:
> about why i use etot_conv_thr
> as well as force_conv_thr= 1.d-6 Ry
> as usual,in vasp and castep software,about 1.d-4 ev is ok
> why it is so different between these DFT software ?
> i don not understand.
> need your help
>
>
>
> 2007/7/13, Stefano de Gironcoli <degironc at sissa.it>:
> >
> > a tipical bond stiffness, if I recall correctly, is in the range of
> > 0.1-1.0
> > Ry/bohr^2 thus a threshold of 1.d-6 Ry/bohr in the force means that you
> > are
> > asking a numerical accuracy in your interatomic distances of the order of
> > 1.d-5-1.d-6 bohr... are you sure you really need it ?
> > best regards,
> > stefano deGironcoli, SISSA & DEMOCRITOS
> >
> > Quoting xu yuehua <njuxuyuehua at gmail.com>:
> >
> > > hello all
> > > i am doing relax.
> > > in my inputfile,
> > > i use Bohr> and the output is
> > > atom 1 type 1 force = 0.00000290 0.00000095 -0.00000364
> > > atom 2 type 1 force = 0.00000081 -0.00000108
> > 0.00000033
> > > atom 3 type 1 force = -0.00000435 -0.00000425 -
> > 0.00000160
> > > atom 4 type 1 force = - 0.00000312 -0.00000321 -
> > 0.00000080
> > > atom 5 type 1 force = -0.00000446 -0.00000036 -
> > 0.00000273
> > > atom 6 type 1 force = -0.00000048 0.00000230
> > 0.00000112
> > > atom 7 type 1 force = 0.00000164 0.00000118
> > 0.00000060
> > > atom 8 type 1 force = 0.00000131 -0.00000040
> > 0.00000145
> > > atom 9 type 2 force = -0.00000362 0.00000154 -
> > 0.00000201
> > > atom 10 type 2 force = - 0.00000029 0.00000191
> > 0.00000302
> > > atom 11 type 2 force = 0.00000576 -0.00000134
> > 0.00000194
> > > atom 12 type 2 force = 0.00000390 0.00000276
> > 0.00000233
> > >
> > > Total force = 0.000015 Total SCF correction = 0.000054
> > > SCF correction compared to forces is too large, reduce conv_thr
> > >
> > > The maximum number of steps has been reached.
> > > my qustion is ,force at every atom is ok ,but why the program asks to
> > > reduce conv_thr
> > > my conv_thr is not enough small ?
> > > or my total relax step (50) is not adequate?
> > > is there any principle about these parameter?
> > > need your help
> > > thanks a lot
> > > --
> > > Xu Yuehua
> > > physics Department of Nanjing university
> > > China
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > SISSA Webmail https://webmail.sissa.it/
> > Powered by Horde http://www.horde.org/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pw_forum mailing list
> > Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> > http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Xu Yuehua
> physics Department of Nanjing university
> China
>
----------------------------------------------------------------
SISSA Webmail https://webmail.sissa.it/
Powered by Horde http://www.horde.org/
More information about the users
mailing list