[Pw_forum] bandgap of germanium
华 李
lvtieyu1975 at yahoo.com.cn
Mon Aug 9 03:51:37 CEST 2004
Dear Paolo:
I have calculated the band structure with lattice constant 5.64613 (A) , and set calculation = 'relax'. Then I get the band gap of the germanium 0.2269 eV. It's also too large.
I tried to optimize band structure, just like CO in example3.
input file :
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
&control
calculation = 'relax'
restart_mode='from_scratch',
prefix='germaniun',
tstress = .true.
tprnfor = .true.
pseudo_dir = '/usr/people/lty/code/pseudo//',
outdir='/usr/people/lty/tmp//'
/
&system
ibrav= 0, nat= 2, ntyp= 1,
ecutwfc =30.0, nbnd = 8
/
&electrons
diagonalization='cg'
mixing_mode = 'plain'
mixing_beta = 0.7
conv_thr = 1.0d-8
/
&ions
upscale = 10.0
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
Ge 72.59 Ge.pz-bhs.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS
Ge 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 1 1
Ge 0.25 0.25 0.25 1 1 1
CELL_PARAMETERS
10.0 00.0 00.0
00.0 10.0 00.0
00.0 00.0 10.0
K_POINTS
6
0.0 0.0 0.0 1.00
0.1 0.1 0.1 1.00
0.2 0.2 0.2 1.00
0.3 0.3 0.3 1.00
0.4 0.4 0.4 1.00
0.5 0.5 0.5 1.00
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
Then I get the band gap :
***********************************************************************
k = 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ( 2777 PWs) bands (ev):
-11.1883 -7.1028 -2.6627 -1.6724 -1.6724 -0.1296 -0.1296 4.2633
k = 0.1000 0.1000 0.1000 ( 2785 PWs) bands (ev):
-11.1650 -7.1625 -2.5315 -1.8738 -1.8738 0.1408 0.1408 2.0930
k = 0.2000 0.2000 0.2000 ( 2785 PWs) bands (ev):
-11.1051 -7.2871 -2.3407 -2.2155 -2.2155 0.5997 0.5997 1.8475
k = 0.3000 0.3000 0.3000 ( 2785 PWs) bands (ev):
-11.0338 -7.3931 -2.4812 -2.4812 -2.3644 0.7896 0.7896 2.4967
k = 0.4000 0.4000 0.4000 ( 2764 PWs) bands (ev):
-10.9785 -7.4498 -2.6302 -2.6302 -2.4865 0.6643 0.6643 3.4208
k = 0.5000 0.5000 0.5000 ( 2800 PWs) bands (ev):
-10.9579 -7.4662 -2.6758 -2.6758 -2.5383 0.5696 0.5696 3.0471
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
The band-gap is -0.8659 eV. I think the band-gap is error. Which must be adjusted in my input-file, then I get the right band-gap ?
Best wishes
tylv
Paolo Giannozzi <giannozz at nest.sns.it> wrote:
On Saturday 31 July 2004 11:04, Bachir Bouhafs wrote:
> [...] I think that you have calculated your band structure at the
> experimental lattice parameter [...] which is greater than the LDA
> value. Which means, that you have applied a negative pressure
> to your crystal, and consequently the band gap increases.
[ please do not post HTML ]
and this is likely to be the main reason of the discrepancy. Other
factors, such as the pseudopotential, cutoff, number of k-points,
may contribute to the difference. For instance: in GaAs, the use
of a nonrelativistic pseudopotential for Ga increases the band gap
by approx. 0.4 eV.
By the way: the tests and examples are NOT meant to give any
realistic description of any realistic systems.
Paolo
--
Paolo Giannozzi e-mail: giannozz at nest.sns.it
Scuola Normale Superiore Phone: +39/050-509876, Fax:-563513
Piazza dei Cavalieri 7 I-56126 Pisa, Italy
_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum at pwscf.org
http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
150万曲MP3疯狂搜,带您闯入音乐殿堂
美女明星应有尽有,搜遍美图、艳图和酷图
1G就是1000兆,雅虎电邮自助扩容!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20040809/9f1c009f/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list