[Pw_forum] installation Error

[Mahmoud Payami]

Hi Dear Goranka!

Thank you very much for your comments. I got the point.

Best regards,

Mahmoud


>
> > When using "make gamma", the result is two files:
> > "phcg.x" and  "pwg.x"  and no (?!) "gamma.x".
> > Is there anything wrong with compilation?
> >
> > Mahmoud
> >
>
> Hi.
> No,  "make gamma" produces phcg.x and pwg.x.
> If you look at the end of the file "Makefile" in directory Gamma, you will
> find the lines:
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ---------
> #
> # targets
> #
> include .dependencies
>
> all: pwg.x phcg.x
>
> pwg.x:  $(GAMMA) $(PWOBJS) pwscf.o
>  $(LD) -o pwg.x $(FFLAGS) pwscf.o $(GAMMA) $(PWOBJS) $(MODULES) $(LFLAGS)
>
> phcg.x: $(GAMMA) $(PWOBJS) $(CGOBJS)
>  $(LD) -o phcg.x $(FFLAGS) $(CGOBJS) $(GAMMA) $(PWOBJS) $(MODULES)
$(LFLAGS)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> -------------------------
> This controls part of the compilation and gives names to Gamma related
> executables.
> It was possible to choose other names.
> You should compare this point with similar rules in Makefiles for other
> components of PWscf. For example,
> the results of "make upf" are: cpmd2upf, oldcp2upf,  vdb2upf  uspp2upf,
> fhi2upf, ncpp2upf,  rrkj2upf.
> This part of compilation is controlled by upftools/Makefile.
>
> Best regards,
> Goranka
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>