[Wannier] Inconsistency between wannier_plot output and the Hamiltonian in the WF basis(_hr.dat)
Fei Xue
feixue at utexas.edu
Fri Oct 19 23:55:12 CEST 2018
Dear Experts,
I have a problem with an apparent inconsistency in the signs of the Wannier
orbital W.F. I observe in the the wannier_plot routine (output in *.xsf),
compared to the the (implied) signs of the orbitals I observe in the
Hamiltonian (*_hr.dat).
The problem detail is the following:
I'm considering bcc Fe, where I use a cubic unit cell with 2 (equivalent)
atoms. Atom1 and atom2 have positions (0,0,0) and a/2*(1,1,1),
respectively. I project on to s, p, d atomic orbitals and do not perform
minimization of the Wannier orbital spread. I obtain an interpolated band
structure from Wannier90 that fits the plane wave solution well.
It suffices to consider the (s, px) orbitals on atom 1 and 2. I plot the
Wannier orbital WFs using Xcrysden. I find that the 's' orbitals have
the same sign on both atoms, while 'px' orbitals have opposite sign on atom
1 and 2.
However, the "hopping" matrix element between these orbitals seem to reveal
that the 'px' orbitals on atom 1 and 2 have the same sign (recall they are
displaced from each other along the x-direction). In particular:
<atom1, s | H | atom2, px > = +1.476
<atom2, s | H | atom1, px > = -1.476
found in the *_hr.dat file as:
0 0 0 1 12 1.476361 0.000002
0 0 0 10 3 -1.476345 0.000003
This pattern of signs for the hopping is inconsistent with the signs of the
wannier orbitals I observe using XCrysDen
This leads to the question: can the output of the code for the Hamiltonian
use different signs for the orbitals compared to the output of the code for
the real space orbitals?
The wannier90 input file is:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
num_bands = 50
num_wann = 18
spin = up
bands_plot = true
wannier_plot = true
wannier_plot_supercell = 5
#dis_win_max = 85d0
dis_froz_max = 30d0
dis_num_iter = 0
num_iter = 1000
dis_mix_ratio = 1
write_hr = true
begin atoms_frac
Fe 0.0 0.0 0.0
Fe 0.5 0.5 0.5
end atoms_frac
begin unit_cell_cart
Bohr
5.4235 0. 0.
0. 5.4235 0.
0. 0. 5.4235
end unit_cell_cart
begin projections
f = 0., 0., 0.: s;p;d
f = 0.5, 0.5, 0.5: s;p;d
end projections
bands_num_points = 100
begin kpoint_path
G 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 H 0.500 -0.5000 -0.5000
H 0.500 -0.5000 -0.5000 P 0.7500 0.2500 -0.2500
P 0.7500 0.2500 -0.2500 N 0.5000 0.0000 -0.5000
end kpoint_path
mp_grid = 8 8 8
begin kpoints
0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00000000
0.00000000 0.00000000 0.12500000
-------------------------------------------------------
Best
Fei
--
Dr. Fei Xue
Postdoctoral Research Associate
University of Maryland/National Institute of Standards and Technology
100 Bureau Dr. Stop 8412
RM B231, Bldg. 216
Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8412
Phone: (301) 975-4360
Work Email: fei.xue at nist.gov
Permanent Email: feixue at utexas.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/wannier/attachments/20181019/69e9f914/attachment.html>
More information about the Wannier
mailing list