[Wannier] on-site energies with spinors - what is the ordering
Christoph Wolf
wolf.christoph at qns.science
Sun Feb 4 14:13:22 CET 2018
Hi everyone,
I guess there are not too many souls out there with this problem! I was
unfortunately not particularly successful in interpreting the formatted spn
file (despite the fact of finding numbers really close to + and -1 there on
occasion) but since it is Sunday I was hoping someone smarter than me might
give the mailing list a look and see my mail. My question, in short, is if
there is a way to relate the <0n|H|0n> matrix elements from the output
with the respective spin state in spinor projections?
Any stimulating thought is very welcome!
Have a nice Sunday everyone!
Chris
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 3:55 PM, Christoph Wolf <wolf.christoph at qns.science>
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am calculating the 5d states of V sitting at (0,0,0) with spinors (10
> bands); the results are the following 10 bands and on-site matrix elements:
>
> Final State
> WF centre and spread 1 ( 0.000000, 0.000000, -0.000000 )
> 0.68743398
> WF centre and spread 2 ( 0.000000, -0.000000, -0.000000 )
> 0.69816595
> WF centre and spread 3 ( 0.000000, -0.000000, -0.000000 )
> 0.86161948
> WF centre and spread 4 ( -0.000000, 0.000000, -0.000000 )
> 0.81006341
> WF centre and spread 5 ( 0.000000, 0.000000, -0.000000 )
> 0.86161948
> WF centre and spread 6 ( 0.000000, -0.000000, 0.000000 )
> 0.81006341
> WF centre and spread 7 ( 0.000000, -0.000000, -0.000000 )
> 0.68743497
> WF centre and spread 8 ( -0.000000, 0.000000, -0.000000 )
> 0.69816710
> WF centre and spread 9 ( 0.000000, -0.000000, 0.000000 )
> 0.86161506
> WF centre and spread 10 ( -0.000000, 0.000000, -0.000000 )
> 0.81006359
>
> On-site Hamiltonian matrix elements
> n <0n|H|0n> (eV)
> -------------------------
> 1 9.825754
> 2 9.453870
> 3 7.903239
> 4 7.274889
> 5 7.903239
> 6 7.274889
> 7 9.825724
> 8 9.453821
> 9 7.903173
>
> I was wondering how to relate n to the spin case. I don't think that these
> are particularly ordered. The projection block was simply V:d (which should
> lead to dz2, dxz, dyz, dx2-y2, dxy), naturally I am now curious how those
> split in the case of SOC but the interpretation is more tricky than
> expected ;)
>
> Without SOC the output reads
>
> Final State
> WF centre and spread 1 ( -0.000000, 0.000000, -0.000000 )
> 0.89324953
> WF centre and spread 2 ( -0.000000, 0.000000, -0.000000 )
> 0.73308504
> WF centre and spread 3 ( 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000 )
> 0.73308504
> WF centre and spread 4 ( -0.000000, -0.000000, 0.000000 )
> 0.89325372
> WF centre and spread 5 ( 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000 )
> 0.73308272
>
> 1 13.945808
> 2 12.157878
> 3 12.157878
> 4 13.945832
> 5 12.157879
>
>
> Any comment is appreciated, I was unable to find this in the mailing list!
>
> Best,
> Chris
> --
> Postdoctoral Researcher
> Center for Quantum Nanoscience, Institute for Basic Science
> Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea
>
>
--
Postdoctoral Researcher
Center for Quantum Nanoscience, Institute for Basic Science
Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/wannier/attachments/20180204/b0f1de99/attachment.html>
More information about the Wannier
mailing list