[Wannier] Wannier90 projection related few queries
Valerio Vitale
vv284 at cam.ac.uk
Fri Aug 24 18:36:22 CEST 2018
Dear Anindya,
/1.If the initial projection of a material( suppose silicon with
projection=sp3) doesn't give the correct wannier band structure in such
a situation what should we do?/
It very much depends on the material, e.g. insulator/semiconductor or
metal, the type of calculation you are doing---simple wannierisation or
disentanglement+wannierisation---as well as convergence with respect to
the k-points grid. If you are interested in a specific material, it'd be
helpful if you could give us more information about what you want to do
and what you have tried so far.
Some obvious options are: 1) Try with random projections. 2) Try the
same initial projections but with a different orientation (look at the
user guide for details). 3) Modify the frozen and outer energy windows
(if any). 4) Try to converge with lower thresholds.
/2.After relaxation, we can check the relaxed coordinate of the atoms of
our desired unit cell and we can also find the fractional relaxed
coordinate values of atoms.Can we directly apply these fractional
coordinate values in the card proj(1),proj(2) etc and can put the
orbital along the coordinates?/
This should be clear from the user_guide. You can specify any fractional
co-ordinate in the projection block and attach to it any orbital in the
list given in the user guide (chapter 3, pag 45-46). The syntax is:
begin projections
f = frac_x , frac_y, frac_z: s (or p,d,sp3, etc.)
.
.
end projections
where the letter "f" instructs the code you are going to specify
fractional co-odinates and frac_x, frac_y, frac_z are the actual values
of the x,y,z components of the relaxed co-ordinates of your atom (or any
other point in the unit cell). This is equivalent to use the atom symbol
(for example Si), if the atomic co-ordinates in the atoms block are the
relaxed ones. The syntax in this case is:
begin projections
Si:s (or p,sp3, etc.)
end projections
/3.Is there any other method to compute the correct projection of materials?
/
In the new release of the code there is going to be a new method to
compute the projections, which doesn't rely on initial guesses, but we
are still working to make it robust.
Best wishes,
Valerio
On 23/08/18 12:59, Anindya Bose wrote:
> Dear Experts,
> It is always a tough job to obtain correct wannier band structure
> which is exactly similar with pw band structure.If wannierization is
> correct,one should obtain correct band structure and band gap also.To
> the best of my knowledge,convergence of band structure is mostly
> depend on the projection.Now I would like to know;
> 1.If the initial projection of a material( suppose silicon with
> projection=sp3) doesn't give the correct wannier band structure in
> such a situation what should we do?
> 2.After relaxation, we can check the relaxed coordinate of the atoms
> of our desired unit cell and we can also find the fractional relaxed
> coordinate values of atoms.Can we directly apply these fractional
> coordinate values in the card proj(1),proj(2) etc and can put the
> orbital along the coordinates?
> Will it make the wannier band structure correct?
> 3.Is there any other method to compute the correct projection of
> materials?
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Anindya Bose
> Research Fellow,
> IIIT Allahabad
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wannier mailing list
> Wannier at lists.quantum-espresso.org
> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/wannier
--
Postdoctoral research associate
Imperial College London
Exhibition road
London SW7 2AZ
and
TCM Group, Cavendish Laboratory
19 JJ Thomson Avenue
Cambridge
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/wannier/attachments/20180824/c39fc24c/attachment.html>
More information about the Wannier
mailing list