[Wannier] Wannier Digest, Vol 105, Issue 7

Riemann Derakhshan riemann.derakhshan at gmail.com
Sun Oct 23 08:31:32 CEST 2016


Dear Arash,

Many thanks for Your prompt answer.

By checking the output file of pw2wannier90, I've noticed that the values
of numk and iknum are different in my calculation. By putting the key  "nosym
= .true. ," in nscf input  file I've fixed it.

Now I have another question.  I've used S and P orbitals  in  the
projections section such as below:
Begin Projections
Si19:s;px;py;pz
Si20:s;px;py;pz
End Projections

As is clear, I've put 4 orbital (s,px,py,pz) in each silicon atom for
calculation of 8 Wannier function. The calculation finished perfectly and
the Interpolated bands was satisfying.

Now I want to use hr_plot data to calculate the On-site and hopping terms.
So I want to know the order of H_{mn} stored in hr_plot.dat.

According to my input file, I guess that order of orbitals is as follow:

1-s, 2-px,3-py,4-pz,5-s,6-px,7-py,8pz

Now my question is this: Am I right about the correct order of orbitals? If
it's not true what is the correct order of orbitals?

Would You do a favor by providing me with a detailed answer about it if
it's possible? It would be a great help and I'll appreciate it.

Sincerely Yours
Riemann




 Sent with Mailtrack
<https://mailtrack.io/install?source=signature&lang=en&referral=riemann.derakhshan@gmail.com&idSignature=22>

-- 
PhD. student of Physics
Physics Department of Damghan University
Tel : +98 938 903 6759
P.O.Box:36716-41167
Damghan, Iran

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:57 AM, <wannier-request at quantum-espresso.org>
wrote:

> Send Wannier mailing list submissions to
>         wannier at quantum-espresso.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://mailman.qe-forge.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wannier
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         wannier-request at quantum-espresso.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         wannier-owner at quantum-espresso.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Wannier digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Wrong number of k-points (Riemann Derakhshan)
>    2. Re: Wrong number of k-points (Mostofi, Arash)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 10:52:47 +0330
> From: Riemann Derakhshan <riemann.derakhshan at gmail.com>
> To: wannier at quantum-espresso.org
> Subject: [Wannier] Wrong number of k-points
> Message-ID:
>         <CA+YmQb=zwDcF5_cUe5_E4FgrDXeG1YXFfGk5Mqv-6o=P7hP-
> VA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Dear Wannier90 Users and DevelopersY,
>
> I want to do the Wannier calculations for silicene. I've modified the input
> files in example-10 for silicene.
>
>  SCF and NSCF part were done completely. But in running Pw2Wannier I've
> faced with this error :
>
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>      task #         0
>      from pw2wannier90 : error #       256
>      Wrong number of k-points
>  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%.
>
> Since I've  created and put the same k-points in NSCF and .win input files
> with kmesh utility such as below:
>
> K-points were created with kmesh utility of Wannier90 package such as
> below:
>
> ./kmesh  8  8  1         ----> for nscf input file
> ./kmesh  8  8 1    w   ----> for .win input file.
>
> I've confused about this error  and I haven't any idea to fix that.
>
> Would You do a favor by providing me a guidance which where I made mistake?
> It would be a great help and I'll appreciate it.
>
> Additionally, input files are attached below for Your consideration.
>
>
> Sincerely Yours
> Riemann
> --
> PhD. student of Physics
> Physics Department of Damghan University
> Tel : +98 938 903 6759
> P.O.Box:36716-41167
> Damghan, Iran
>
>
>
>  Sent with Mailtrack
> <https://mailtrack.io/install?source=signature&lang=en&
> referral=riemann.derakhshan at gmail.com&idSignature=22>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mailman.qe-forge.org/pipermail/wannier/attachments/
> 20161021/049eb368/attachment-0001.html>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: sisilicon-scf.in
> Type: application/octet-stream
> Size: 1370 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <http://mailman.qe-forge.org/pipermail/wannier/attachments/
> 20161021/049eb368/attachment-0004.obj>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: sisilicon-nscf.in
> Type: application/octet-stream
> Size: 5421 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <http://mailman.qe-forge.org/pipermail/wannier/attachments/
> 20161021/049eb368/attachment-0005.obj>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: sisilicon.win
> Type: application/octet-stream
> Size: 3440 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <http://mailman.qe-forge.org/pipermail/wannier/attachments/
> 20161021/049eb368/attachment-0006.obj>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: sisilicon.pw2wan
> Type: application/octet-stream
> Size: 101 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <http://mailman.qe-forge.org/pipermail/wannier/attachments/
> 20161021/049eb368/attachment-0007.obj>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 08:26:52 +0000
> From: "Mostofi, Arash" <a.mostofi at imperial.ac.uk>
> To: wannier <wannier at quantum-espresso.org>
> Subject: Re: [Wannier] Wrong number of k-points
> Message-ID: <98A69D9C-EEB9-457F-9BF1-2BD328C82DBF at imperial.ac.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Dear Riemann,
> Your nscf and win files look OK in terms of the number of k-points, so as
> long as you are doing everything in the right sequence then it should be
> OK. The output file of pw2wannier90 should tell you how many k-points it
> has from the electronic structure calculation and how many it is expecting
> from Wannier90 (there will be line that gives the values of numk and iknum)
> and this might provide a further clue as to what is going on.
> Best wishes,
> Arash
>
> ?
> Arash Mostofi ? www.mostofigroup.org<http://www.mostofigroup.org>
> Director, CDT in Theory and Simulation of Materials
> Imperial College London
>
> On 21 Oct 2016, at 08:22, Riemann Derakhshan <riemann.derakhshan at gmail.com
> <mailto:riemann.derakhshan at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> Dear Wannier90 Users and DevelopersY,
>
> I want to do the Wannier calculations for silicene. I've modified the
> input files in example-10 for silicene.
>
>  SCF and NSCF part were done completely. But in running Pw2Wannier I've
> faced with this error :
>
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>      task #         0
>      from pw2wannier90 : error #       256
>      Wrong number of k-points
>  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%.
>
> Since I've  created and put the same k-points in NSCF and .win input files
> with kmesh utility such as below:
>
> K-points were created with kmesh utility of Wannier90 package such as
> below:
>
> ./kmesh  8  8  1         ----> for nscf input file
> ./kmesh  8  8 1    w   ----> for .win input file.
>
> I've confused about this error  and I haven't any idea to fix that.
>
> Would You do a favor by providing me a guidance which where I made
> mistake? It would be a great help and I'll appreciate it.
>
> Additionally, input files are attached below for Your consideration.
>
>
> Sincerely Yours
> Riemann
> --
> PhD. student of Physics
> Physics Department of Damghan University
> Tel : +98 938 903 6759
> P.O.Box:36716-41167
> Damghan, Iran
>
>
>
> [https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/mailtrack-crx/icon-signature.png]
> Sent with Mailtrack<https://mailtrack.io/install?source=signature&
> lang=en&referral=riemann.derakhshan at gmail.com&idSignature=22>
>
> <sisilicon-scf.in><sisilicon-nscf.in><sisilicon.win><
> sisilicon.pw2wan>_______________________________________________
> Wannier mailing list
> Wannier at quantum-espresso.org<mailto:Wannier at quantum-espresso.org>
> http://mailman.qe-forge.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wannier
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mailman.qe-forge.org/pipermail/wannier/attachments/
> 20161021/8a5a2ab4/attachment.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wannier mailing list
> Wannier at quantum-espresso.org
> http://mailman.qe-forge.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/wannier
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of Wannier Digest, Vol 105, Issue 7
> ***************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/wannier/attachments/20161023/10bc5abb/attachment.html>


More information about the Wannier mailing list