[Wannier] Initial projection wannier centers (symmetry adapted wannier functions)
Tobias Frank
pike.lucius at gmail.com
Thu Dec 17 15:31:39 CET 2015
Dear wannier90 users,
I currently try to wannierize MoS2, which has a disconnected band manifold
of 11 bands (5 Mo d orbitals and 2*3 S p orbitals).
*----------------------------------------------------------------------------*
| Site Fractional Coordinate Cartesian Coordinate (Ang)
|
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Mo 1 0.33333 0.66667 0.50000 | -0.00000 1.84059 12.50000
|
| S 1 0.66667 0.33333 0.56240 | 1.59400 0.92030 14.05992
|
| S 2 0.66667 0.33333 0.43760 | 1.59400 0.92030 10.94008
|
*----------------------------------------------------------------------------*
The goal is to get a symmetric tight-binding Hamiltonian (_hr.dat) out of
the calculation. The scheme I use is to project onto atomic orbitals
without any maximal localization iteration applied ("symmetry adapted
wannier functions") and guiding centers are turned on.
My initial (and final) state reads:
projections:Mo:d, S:p
Initial State
WF centre and spread 1 ( -0.000000, 1.840629, 12.500000 )
1.65212451
WF centre and spread 2 ( -0.000000, 1.797275, 12.500000 )
1.88788741
WF centre and spread 3 ( -0.000000, 1.883825, 12.500000 )
1.88514896
WF centre and spread 4 ( -0.000000, 1.744405, 12.500000 )
1.79754077
WF centre and spread 5 ( -0.000000, 1.936664, 12.500000 )
1.79758431
WF centre and spread 6 ( 1.594000, 0.920313, 14.121223 )
1.69614206
WF centre and spread 7 ( 1.594000, 0.932663, 14.015563 )
1.56344882
WF centre and spread 8 ( 1.594000, 0.908001, 14.015556 )
1.56201127
WF centre and spread 9 ( 1.594000, 0.920313, 10.878777 )
1.69614206
WF centre and spread 10 ( 1.594000, 0.932663, 10.984437 )
1.56344882
WF centre and spread 11 ( 1.594000, 0.908001, 10.984444 )
1.56201127
Sum of centres and spreads ( 9.564000, 14.724751,137.500000 )
18.66349025
This yields a very good description of the band structure, but why are the
initial projections not exactly at the atomic sites, where I specified them
to be? This slight asymmetry reflects also in the tight-binding matrix
elements, where I would like to have symmetric ones. Could you give me a
hint how to get the wannier centers at the atomic positions?
I am aware about the publication of Sakuma ("Symmetry-adapted Wannier
functions in the maximal localization procedure"). I am using Quantum
Espresso, where it is not implemented. Is there any work on the way?
Thank you very much,
Tobias Frank
PhD student
Universität Regensburg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/wannier/attachments/20151217/c48151ae/attachment.html>
More information about the Wannier
mailing list