[Wannier] how to calculate fermi surface with VASP and WANNIER90
Jonathan Yates
jonathan.yates at materials.ox.ac.uk
Wed Jan 29 14:05:54 CET 2014
On 29 Jan 2014, at 10:24, 刘仕晨 wrote:
> Dear All:
>
> I've just started to use the wannier90 code, and having a little problem. so, I would appreciate very much if you could give me a little bit of suggestions.
> I want to know how to calculate fermi surface with VASP and WANNIER90, I failed to get a good result for some metals.
Shi-Chen,
You've not given us much information here - how do you decide what is good result, and which metals fail?
Anyhow, let me make some generic comments:
In order for the wannier interpolation, and hence Fermi surface calculation, to work well you need to have "good" (ie well localised) wannier functions.
- Are your WF real?
- Do the wannier interpolated bands match well the VASP bands in the region of interest?
If these conditions are not satisfied, you should not expect to get a meaningful fermi surface.
In the wannier tutorial there are examples for Copper and Iron - these are written for pwscf, but they could be easily adapted for vasp.
Finally, I note that you are using a 20 20 20 MP grid to generate the Wannier functions - this is likely to be far more than is needed for converged results (not a problem, just makes the calculations a lot slower). You might find it easier to start with a pretty small grid (eg 4x4x4) to get things working, then move up to a larger grid to converge the results to the accuracy you require.
Jonathan
--
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PH, UK
tel: +44 (0)1865 612797 http://users.ox.ac.uk/~oums0549/
More information about the Wannier
mailing list