[Wannier] about the wannier90_hr.dat file
Gianluca Giovannetti
gianluca.giovannetti at gmail.com
Tue Dec 6 09:31:21 CET 2011
Dear Jonathan,
thank you for the reply.
Using:
guiding_centres = T
the situation improves:
Cycle: 1000
LINE --> Iteration : 1000
LINE --> Spread at initial point : 87.6286372239062
LINE --> Spread at trial step : 87.6286372239063
LINE --> Slope along search direction : -1.541916642988277E-017
LINE --> ||SD gradient||^2 : 1.544096354738086E-015
LINE --> Trial step length : 2.00000000000000
LINE --> Optimal parabolic step length : 4.338226673863846E-004
LINE --> Spread at predicted minimum : 87.6286372239062
LINE --> CG coefficient : 0.999995534026802
WF centre and spread 1 ( 8.776812, 0.465560, 7.738687 )
58.36280050 <<<-----------
WF centre and spread 2 ( 5.485742, 9.409140, 8.702739 )
9.81781675
WF centre and spread 3 ( 7.665904, 4.358372, 8.556469 )
9.82773595
WF centre and spread 4 ( 3.155283, 4.303197, 8.509082 )
9.62028402
Sum of centres and spreads ( 25.083740, 18.536269, 33.506978 )
87.62863722
1000 0.000E+00 0.0000000393 87.6286372239 35.11 <--
CONV
O_D= 48.5782103 O_OD= 0.0676344 O_TOT= 87.6286372 <--
SPRD
Delta: O_D= 0.0000000E+00 O_OD= -0.1554312E-14 O_TOT= 0.0000000E+00 <--
DLTA
the center of the first WF is now at the correct place (center of one of
the molecular sites) but still the spread is too big. :-(
cheers,
Gianluca
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Jonathan Yates <
jonathan.yates at materials.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> On 3 Dec 2011, at 14:39, Gianluca Giovannetti wrote:
>
> > Dear All,
> >
> >
> > However in the wannier90.wout the spread of one of the Wannier functions
> is very large (----> 152.37216676):
> >
> > Cycle: 1000
> > WF centre and spread 1 ( 6.466896, 3.625330, 2.430574 )
> 152.37216676
> > WF centre and spread 2 ( 5.485734, 9.409137, 8.702740 )
> 9.81928932
> > WF centre and spread 3 ( 7.666070, 4.358506, 8.556600 )
> 9.83226929
> > WF centre and spread 4 ( 3.155228, 4.303197, 8.509269 )
> 9.62144690
> > Sum of centres and spreads ( 22.773929, 21.696169, 28.199184 )
> 181.64517227
> >
> > 2) How can i get a small SPREAD?
>
> Gianluca,
>
> Try re-running the calculation with
> guiding_centres = T
>
> I think you have a problem with the code finding the wrong branch cut for
> the complex log in the evaluation of Omega_D (ie your total Omega_D is
> huge, but Omega_OD is sensible). The guiding centres option should help
> take the correct branch cut.
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
>
> --
> Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1
> 3PH, UK
> tel: +44 (0)1865 612797 http://users.ox.ac.uk/~oums0549/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wannier mailing list
> Wannier at quantum-espresso.org
> http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/wannier
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/wannier/attachments/20111206/e684592a/attachment.html>
More information about the Wannier
mailing list