[QE-users] bfgs failed after 25 scf cycles and 23 bfgs steps, convergence not achieved
Barsha Pal
barsha.pal at aus.ac.in
Sat Apr 26 10:02:46 CEST 2025
The error I have got is:
Message from routine bfgs:
history already reset at previous step: exiting
Energy error = 3.4E-09 Ry
Gradient error = 4.0E-05 Ry/Bohr
Cell gradient error = 2.8E-03 kbar
bfgs failed after 25 scf cycles and 23 bfgs steps, convergence not
achieved
(criteria: energy < 1.0E-06 Ry, force < 1.0E-05 Ry/Bohr, cell <
5.0E-03 kbar)
End of BFGS Geometry Optimization
Final enthalpy = - ** Ry
File ./vc/g.bfgs deleted, as requested
Begin final coordinates
new unit-cell volume = ** a.u.^3 ( **Ang^3 )
density = ** g/cm^3
CELL_PARAMETERS (alat= )
ATOMIC_POSITIONS (crystal)
End final coordinates
---------
I get this message for a spin orbit coupling calculations, I had used all
relativistic pseudos. Input file description is as follows:
&CONTROL
calculation = "vc-relax"
etot_conv_thr = 1.00e-06
forc_conv_thr = 1.00e-05
nstep = 100
outdir = "./vc"
prefix = "g"
pseudo_dir = "./"
verbosity = "high"
/
&SYSTEM
celldm(1) =
degauss = 0.000735
ecutrho = 440
ecutwfc = 110
ibrav = 0
nat =
ntyp = 2
occupations = "smearing"
smearing = "gaussian"
starting_magnetization(1) = 0.00000
starting_magnetization(2) = 1.00000
noncolin = .true.
lspinorb = .true.
/
&ELECTRONS
conv_thr = 1.00000e-08
electron_maxstep = 200
mixing_beta = 7.00000e-01
/
&IONS
ion_dynamics = "bfgs"
/
&CELL
cell_dofree = "2Dxy"
cell_dynamics = "bfgs"
press = 0.00000e+00
press_conv_thr = 5.00000e-03
/
K_POINTS {automatic}
8 8 1 0 0 0
CELL_PARAMETERS {alat}
ATOMIC_SPECIES
A ******* A.upf !using norm-conserving and full relativistic
with pbe
B ******* B.upf !using norm-conserving and full relativistic
with pbe
ATOMIC_POSITIONS {crystal}
What should I do next for optimization to be converged?
Also, please provide some guidelines for applying the magnetization value.
How much should it be used?
If I have two types of atoms and put zero for starting_magnetization for
both, how is it taken? If magnetization is given for one type of atom then
how is it calculated? And if startine_magnetization is given for both, then
what does the code consider?
Thank you.
Ashley Cooper
Phd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20250426/eaaed2d7/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list