[QE-users] Test-suite failing QE-7.4.1

Thu Apr 3 08:38:56 CEST 2025

Dear Ian
We checked the test suite with as many toolchains as possible and all 
tests were passing for 7.4.1.
The failures you report may be due to your particular build. Could  you 
send us the details of your build ?

In general  can always verify the status ( of the develop ) at this link:
http://test-farm.quantum-espresso.org:8010/#/
  all tests are passing for most of the architectures and the few 
failures are passing and the few failure are due to things added after 7.4.1

Pietro

On 4/3/25 04:46, Ian Dunn via users wrote:
>
> I’d like to add some more details to my previous post.
>
> The SKIPPED tests (shown below) seem to be related to libxc. Am I 
> correct to understand that linking libxc should fix these issues?
>
> pw_libxc - lda_pol_atom-lsda.in: SKIPPED.
>
> pw_libxc - gga_unpol_atom-pbe.in: SKIPPED.
>
> pw_libxc - hyb_gga_unpol_hse-si111.in: SKIPPED.
>
> pw_libxc - mgga_unpol_metaGGA.in: SKIPPED.
>
> pw_metaGGA - metaGGA-spin.in: SKIPPED.
>
> cp_h2o_scan_libxc - nspin1.in: SKIPPED.
>
> cp_h2o_scan_libxc - nspin2.in: SKIPPED.
>
> As for the FAILED tests, there are at least a few different kinds of 
> test failures. Inspecting just a few of them, I noticed quite a few 
> significant numerical error failures, such as:
>
> Running MATDYN ...
>
> ph_2d - matdyn2.in (arg(s): 8): **FAILED**.
>
> phfreq
>
>     ERROR: absolute error 3.31e+01 greater than 2.00e+00. (Test: 
> 153.623568.  Benchmark: 120.484548.)
>
> phfreq
>
>     ERROR: absolute error 3.32e+01 greater than 2.00e+00. (Test: 
> 152.592412.  Benchmark: 119.428604.)
>
> phfreq
>
>     ERROR: absolute error 3.32e+01 greater than 2.00e+00. (Test: 
> 149.536582.  Benchmark: 116.327582.)
>
> phfreq
>
>     ERROR: absolute error 3.32e+01 greater than 2.00e+00. (Test: 
> 144.559796.  Benchmark: 111.370081.)
>
> phfreq
>
>     ERROR: absolute error 3.30e+01 greater than 2.00e+00. (Test: 
> 137.807317.  Benchmark: 104.835563.)
>
> phfreq
>
>     ERROR: absolute error 3.24e+01 greater than 2.00e+00. (Test: 
> 129.433032.  Benchmark: 97.055119.)
>
> ……
>
> I also noticed in the SiC.phG.restart2.in example that the job fails 
> since the pseudopotential copied into SiC.save is an empty file.
>
> There are probably other error messages embedded in the test.out 
> files, but rather than spend a while cataloging I’d like to see what 
> is already known on the test-suite topic by people in the forum.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Ian Dunn
>
> ASML
>
> *From:*users <users-bounces at lists.quantum-espresso.org> *On Behalf Of 
> *Ian Dunn via users
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 2, 2025 9:18 PM
> *To:* users at lists.quantum-espresso.org
> *Subject:* [QE-users] Test-suite failing QE-7.4.1
>
> *CAUTION:*This message is from an external sender
>
> Hi, I’m a new Quantum Espresso user and would like to check that my 
> installation of QE was successful. I have attempted to run the test 
> suite and was able to get all the paths setup properly to my knowledge 
> and pseudopotentials downloaded, but I’m getting errors from some of 
> the tests. I execute the test suite by running “make run-tests”.
>
> In version 7.3.1 from the QE website I was already getting errors so I 
> tried running 7.4.1 off of Gitlab in hopes that the test-suite would 
> be fixed in the latest release. Here is a summary of the output in v7.4.1:
>
> PW:
>
> All done. 248 out of 248 tests passed (5 skipped).
>
> CP:
>
> All done. 33 out of 33 tests passed (2 skipped).
>
> PH:
>
> All done. ERROR: only 23 out of 73 tests passed.
>
> Failed tests in:
>
> /hpc/home/idunn/7.4.1/test-suite/ph_1d/
>
> /hpc/home/idunn/7.4.1/test-suite/ph_2d/
>
> /hpc/home/idunn/7.4.1/test-suite/ph_U_insulator_paw/
>
> /hpc/home/idunn/7.4.1/test-suite/ph_U_insulator_us/
>
> /hpc/home/idunn/7.4.1/test-suite/ph_U_metal_paw/
>
> /hpc/home/idunn/7.4.1/test-suite/ph_U_metal_us/
>
> /hpc/home/idunn/7.4.1/test-suite/ph_ahc_diam/
>
> /hpc/home/idunn/7.4.1/test-suite/ph_base/
>
> /hpc/home/idunn/7.4.1/test-suite/ph_insulator_paw_magn/
>
> /hpc/home/idunn/7.4.1/test-suite/ph_insulator_us_magn/
>
> /hpc/home/idunn/7.4.1/test-suite/ph_interpol_metal/
>
> /hpc/home/idunn/7.4.1/test-suite/ph_metal/
>
> /hpc/home/idunn/7.4.1/test-suite/ph_restart/
>
> /hpc/home/idunn/7.4.1/test-suite/ph_twochem/
>
> And after PH none of the other test categories run.
>
> Is there a problem with the compilation/installation and should I 
> (mis)trust the results? Is this known behavior? Also why are some 
> tests being skipped and does that also present a problem? Thanks in 
> advance for your support!
>
> Best regards,
>
> Ian Dunn
>
> --- The information contained in this communication and any 
> attachments is confidential and may be privileged, and is for the sole 
> use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized review, use, 
> disclosure or distribution is prohibited. Unless explicitly stated 
> otherwise in the body of this communication or the attachment thereto 
> (if any), the information is provided on an AS-IS basis without any 
> express or implied warranties or liabilities. To the extent you are 
> relying on this information, you are doing so at your own risk. If you 
> are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately 
> by replying to this message and destroy all copies of this message and 
> any attachments. Neither the sender nor the company/group of companies 
> he or she represents shall be liable for the proper and complete 
> transmission of the information contained in this communication, or 
> for any delay in its receipt.
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> The Quantum ESPRESSO Foundation stands in solidarity with all civilians worldwide who are victims of terrorism, military aggression, and indiscriminate warfare.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
> users mailing listusers at lists.quantum-espresso.org
> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20250403/5d11ba82/attachment.html>