[QE-users] puzzle on homo higher than lumo
Paolo Giannozzi
paolo.giannozzi at uniud.it
Sat Mar 9 19:31:43 CET 2024
If you set occupancies to "fixed", the code assumes that the system is
an insulator and computes the HOMO as the highest N-th Kohn-Sham state,
the LUMO as the lowest (N+1)-th KS state (N=half the number of
electrons). If the system does not want to be an insulator, the "HOMO"
might turn out to have higher energy than the "LUMO".
Paolo
On 09/03/2024 03:38, wangzongyi via users wrote:
> Dear all
> I am trying to calculate metallic oxide(CoO). However, I have some
> puzzle in writing vcrelax.in file.
> As the experience shows that CoO is insulator, my vcrelax.in file is
> showed in the following lines, I calculate it as insulator
> * &control*
> * calculation='vc-relax'*
> * restart_mode='from_scratch',*
> * prefix='CoO'*
> * pseudo_dir = '../../files/pseudo'*
> * outdir='./tmp'*
> * verbosity='high'*
> * etot_conv_thr = 1.0D-4*
> * forc_conv_thr = 1.0D-3*
> * /*
> * &system*
> * ibrav = 0,*
> * celldm(1) = 8.00,*
> * nat = 4,*
> * ntyp = 3,*
> * ecutwfc = 50.0*
> * ecutrho = 400.0*
> * nspin = 2*
> * tot_magnetization=0.00*
> * occupations = 'fixed',*
> * nbnd = 28*
> * /*
> * &electrons*
> * conv_thr = 1.d-10*
> * startingwfc ='file'*
> * startingpot ='file'*
> * /*
> * &ions*
> * ion_dynamics = 'bfgs'*
> * /*
> * &cell*
> * cell_dynamics = 'bfgs'*
> * /*
> *ATOMIC_SPECIES*
> * Co1 58.933194 co_pbesol_v1.2.uspp.F.UPF*
> * Co2 58.933194 co_pbesol_v1.2.uspp.F.UPF*
> * O 15.999 O.pbesol-n-kjpaw_psl.0.1.UPF*
> *ATOMIC_POSITIONS {crystal}*
> *Co1 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00000000*
> *Co2 0.50000000 0.50000000 0.50000000*
> *O 0.25000000 0.25000000 0.25000000*
> *O 0.75000000 0.75000000 0.75000000*
> *CELL_PARAMETERS {alat}*
> * 0.570726115 0.570726115 1.031099100*
> * 0.570726115 1.031099100 0.570726115*
> * 1.031099100 0.570726115 0.570726115*
> *K_POINTS {automatic}*
> * 6 6 6 0 0 0*
> *HUBBARD {ortho-atomic}*
> *U Co1-3d 6.7553*
> *U Co2-3d 6.7553*
> however, the outfile shows that
> *highest occupied, lowest unoccupied level (ev): 14.3247 13.7975*
> I am puzzled, what happened, why is homo higher than lumo? is my
> calculation correect? Or should I regard the system as matel when
> calculate varelax?
> Thank you very much
--
Paolo Giannozzi, Dip. Scienze Matematiche Informatiche e Fisiche,
Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 206, 33100 Udine Italy, +39-0432-558216
More information about the users
mailing list