[QE-users] Spin counting in hp.x with paramagnetic metals
Iurii Timrov
iurii.timrov at epfl.ch
Tue Sep 12 11:30:30 CEST 2023
Dear Theo,
How do you model the paramagnetic state? Please note that "paramagnetic" and "nonmagnetic" state is not the same thing.
For nonmagnetic calculations there is a factor of 2 due to spin degeneracy when computing sums over electronic states (i.e. in charge density, occupation matrix, and other quantities). If you take a nonmagnetic material (e.g. LiCoO2) and model it as a spin-polarized system (nspin=2), the value of U will be the same as when modeling it as nonmagetic (because the magnetization will be zero). So I do not understand why do you have a factor of 2 difference for U in your simulations.
Greetings,
Iurii
--
Dr. Iurii TIMROV
Senior Research Scientist
Theory and Simulation of Materials (THEOS)
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL)
CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
+41 21 69 34 881
http://people.epfl.ch/265334
________________________________
From: users <users-bounces at lists.quantum-espresso.org> on behalf of Theo Weinberger <tiw21 at cam.ac.uk>
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 11:21:03 AM
To: users at lists.quantum-espresso.org
Subject: [QE-users] Spin counting in hp.x with paramagnetic metals
Dear Quantum Espresso Users,
I have been using the hp.x code to calculate the Hubbard-U corrections for correlated metallic systems in both their spin-polarised and paramagnetic states.
In several materials I have noticed that the Hubbard-U value determined for a material in its paramagnetic ground state is approximately twice that compared to when a spin-polarised ground state is assumed (with all other parameters kept the same).
I was wondering whether anyone had any insight into how the accounting for spins in occupied Hubbard states works for the hp.x code and whether the paramagnetic implementation of hp.x perhaps counts all spins states twice resulting in this larger value.
Thank you in advance,
Theo Weinberger
PhD Student
University of Cambridge
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20230912/1a9e9883/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list