[QE-users] question about last steps of vc-relax

Paolo Giannozzi paolo.giannozzi at uniud.it
Mon Sep 4 11:42:45 CEST 2023


On 9/4/23 11:09, Konstantin Glazyrin wrote:

> An example - target relaxation pressure 600 kbar:
> 1 - total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=     
>   600.65 - last run of structure relaxation
> 2 - total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=     
>   484.28 - final scf run
> May I ask - what does it indicate

it indicates that your kinetic cutoff is too low for a good description 
of the pressure

> which value I should trust more and how should I proceed?

the former is the pressure, computed for the plane-wave basis set of the 
INITIAL unit cell.
The latter is the pressure, computed for the plane-wave basis set of the 
FINAL unit cell.
They should converge to the same value at sufficiently high cutoff.

> Is it because of this?
> SCF correction compared to forces is large: reduce conv_thr to get 
> better values
> For me it is conv_thr =   6.4000000000d-06

it is a bit too large, but it is hardly related to the original problem

Paolo

> Thank you!
> best wishes,
>              Konstantin
> 
> -- 
> Beamline Scientist
> DESY, FS-PE, bldg. 47c, L115
> Notkestrasse 85
> 22607 Hamburg, Germany
> 
> _______________________________________________
> The Quantum ESPRESSO community stands by the Ukrainian
> people and expresses its concerns about the devastating
> effects that the Russian military offensive has on their
> country and on the free and peaceful scientific, cultural,
> and economic cooperation amongst peoples
> _______________________________________________
> Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
> users mailing list users at lists.quantum-espresso.org
> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

-- 
Paolo Giannozzi, Dip. Scienze Matematiche Informatiche e Fisiche,
Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222


More information about the users mailing list