[QE-users] question about last steps of vc-relax
Paolo Giannozzi
paolo.giannozzi at uniud.it
Mon Sep 4 11:42:45 CEST 2023
On 9/4/23 11:09, Konstantin Glazyrin wrote:
> An example - target relaxation pressure 600 kbar:
> 1 - total stress (Ry/bohr**3) (kbar) P=
> 600.65 - last run of structure relaxation
> 2 - total stress (Ry/bohr**3) (kbar) P=
> 484.28 - final scf run
> May I ask - what does it indicate
it indicates that your kinetic cutoff is too low for a good description
of the pressure
> which value I should trust more and how should I proceed?
the former is the pressure, computed for the plane-wave basis set of the
INITIAL unit cell.
The latter is the pressure, computed for the plane-wave basis set of the
FINAL unit cell.
They should converge to the same value at sufficiently high cutoff.
> Is it because of this?
> SCF correction compared to forces is large: reduce conv_thr to get
> better values
> For me it is conv_thr = 6.4000000000d-06
it is a bit too large, but it is hardly related to the original problem
Paolo
> Thank you!
> best wishes,
> Konstantin
>
> --
> Beamline Scientist
> DESY, FS-PE, bldg. 47c, L115
> Notkestrasse 85
> 22607 Hamburg, Germany
>
> _______________________________________________
> The Quantum ESPRESSO community stands by the Ukrainian
> people and expresses its concerns about the devastating
> effects that the Russian military offensive has on their
> country and on the free and peaceful scientific, cultural,
> and economic cooperation amongst peoples
> _______________________________________________
> Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
> users mailing list users at lists.quantum-espresso.org
> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Paolo Giannozzi, Dip. Scienze Matematiche Informatiche e Fisiche,
Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222
More information about the users
mailing list