[QE-users] Role of alpha_mix flag in electron-phonon calculations
Prarena Jamwal
prarena.19phz0008 at iitrpr.ac.in
Thu Nov 10 06:42:28 CET 2022
Dear users and developers,
I am using QE v7.0 and trying to investigate the superconductivity of a 2D
material. I have used the PBE pseudopotential from PSlibrary and took Kmesh
36x36x1.
After vc-relax, the resulted forces and stress are:
*Total force = 0.000014 Total SCF correction = 0.000001
Computing stress (Cartesian axis) and pressure negative rho (up,
down): 1.001E-01 0.000E+00 total stress (Ry/bohr**3)
(kbar) P= -0.10*
Are these values acceptable? Do I need to reduce these values?
Here a typical ph.in file I use:
*title_line&inputph prefix = 'W2F2', fildyn = 'W2F2.dyn', amass(1) =
18.9984032, amass(2) = 183.84, outdir = './' ldisp = .true.,
trans = .true., fildvscf = 'dvscf', search_sym=.FALSE., alpha_mix(1) =
0.2, nq1=3, nq2=3, nq3=1, tr2_ph = 1.0d-12/*
When I ran ph.in by adding "*alpha_mix flag"*, I am getting* no imaginary
frequencies*, but the lambda.out file shows NaN
*lambda = 0.835778 ( NaN ) <log w>= NaN K N(Ef)= 11.024689 at
degauss= 0.005 lambda = 0.598189 ( NaN ) <log w>= NaN K
N(Ef)= 10.196114 at degauss= 0.010 lambda = 0.526611 ( NaN )
<log w>= NaN K N(Ef)= 9.481577 at degauss= 0.015 lambda =
0.485222 ( NaN ) <log w>= NaN K N(Ef)= 8.817546 at degauss=
0.020 lambda = 0.465900 ( NaN ) <log w>= NaN K N(Ef)=
8.336884 at degauss= 0.025 lambda = 0.466822 ( NaN ) <log w>=
NaN K N(Ef)= 8.111690 at degauss= 0.030 lambda = 0.481500 (
NaN ) <log w>= NaN K N(Ef)= 8.111006 at degauss= 0.035
lambda = 0.504944 ( NaN ) <log w>= NaN K N(Ef)= 8.267627 at
degauss= 0.040 lambda = 0.532578 ( NaN ) <log w>= NaN K
N(Ef)= 8.520600 at degauss= 0.045 lambda = 0.562378 ( NaN )
<log w>= NaN K N(Ef)= 8.823055 at degauss= 0.050lambda
omega_log T_c 0.83578 NaN NaN
0.59819 NaN NaN 0.52661 NaN
NaN 0.48522 NaN NaN 0.46590 NaN
NaN 0.46682 NaN NaN 0.48150
NaN NaN 0.50494 NaN NaN
0.53258 NaN NaN*
* 0.56238 NaN NaN*
And when I ran ph.in *without alpha_mix flag*, there were imaginary
frequencies in the phonon dispersion and I am getting values in lambda.out
file
*lambda = 0.760811 ( 0.760801 ) <log w>= 197.892 K N(Ef)= 11.024689 at
degauss= 0.005 lambda = 0.573322 ( 0.573317 ) <log w>= 188.429 K
N(Ef)= 10.196114 at degauss= 0.010 lambda = 0.520900 ( 0.520896 )
<log w>= 184.554 K N(Ef)= 9.481577 at degauss= 0.015 lambda =
0.488111 ( 0.488108 ) <log w>= 183.224 K N(Ef)= 8.817546 at degauss=
0.020 lambda = 0.474378 ( 0.474375 ) <log w>= 182.309 K N(Ef)=
8.336884 at degauss= 0.025 lambda = 0.481178 ( 0.481175 ) <log w>=
181.389 K N(Ef)= 8.111690 at degauss= 0.030 lambda = 0.502378 (
0.502375 ) <log w>= 180.618 K N(Ef)= 8.111006 at degauss= 0.035
lambda = 0.533389 ( 0.533386 ) <log w>= 180.243 K N(Ef)= 8.267627 at
degauss= 0.040 lambda = 0.569867 ( 0.569863 ) <log w>= 180.075 K
N(Ef)= 8.520600 at degauss= 0.045 lambda = 0.608489 ( 0.608486 )
<log w>= 180.009 K N(Ef)= 8.823055 at degauss= 0.050*
*lambda omega_log T_c 0.76081 197.892
7.177 0.57332 188.429 2.921 0.52090 184.554
1.950 0.48811 183.224 1.439 0.47438
182.309 1.243 0.48118 181.389 1.329
0.50238 180.618 1.624 0.53339 180.243
2.106 0.56987 180.075 2.730 0.60849 180.009
3.443*
Could anyone tell me what was going wrong here.
Kindly help me to fix this.
Thank you.
Regards
Prarena Jamwal
Research Scholar
IIT Ropar, INDIA.
--
**CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The
contents of this email message and any
attachments are intended solely
for the addressee(s) and may contain
confidential and/or privileged
information and may be legally protected
from disclosure. If you are not
the intended recipient of this message or
their agent, or if this
message has been addressed to you in error, please
immediately alert the
sender by reply email and then delete this message
and any attachments.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any
use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this message
or its
attachments is strictly prohibited.*
*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20221110/e1c8f47e/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list