[QE-users] Integrated oribtal resolved DOS does not equal number of electrons
Paolo Giannozzi
paolo.giannozzi at uniud.it
Tue Jul 5 22:05:36 CEST 2022
On 05/07/2022 21:45, Schön, Carl-Friedrich wrote:
> If I use the pdos however, I lose quite a margin: 59.86/60 , which is
> quite significant. [] am I suspecting correctly that the missing electrons
> are getting lost, as they would be projected to orbitals I do not
> include (lets say some f-orbitals that very slightly hybridize, but are
> not included in the orbitals I project unto)?
yes
> According to the archives, the spilling factor should give an indication
> of the difference, which is: 0.0021 for me, but I don’t understand how
> that number represents what I see in the integrated DOS. It seems to be
> also fairly small for my calculation.
it's a percentage: 0.0021=0.21% of electrons lost. 0.0021*60=0.126,
quite close to the missing charge you get
Paolo
>
> Are there any „tricks“ to decrease this discrepancy?
>
> Thank you and all the best,
>
> Carl-Friedrich Schön, PhD Student, RWTH Aachen University
>
> _______________________________________________
> The Quantum ESPRESSO community stands by the Ukrainian
> people and expresses its concerns about the devastating
> effects that the Russian military offensive has on their
> country and on the free and peaceful scientific, cultural,
> and economic cooperation amongst peoples
> _______________________________________________
> Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
> users mailing list users at lists.quantum-espresso.org
> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Paolo Giannozzi, Dip. Scienze Matematiche Informatiche e Fisiche,
Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222
More information about the users
mailing list