[QE-users] Different phonon frequencies at Gamma point via q2r.x + dynmat.x and matdyn.x calculation.
zhishuohuang at gmail.com
zhishuohuang at gmail.com
Thu Feb 3 10:43:31 CET 2022
Dear all,
I encountered one problem when doing phonon calculations.
I tried to do the test calculation provided in the
'qe-6.8/PHonon/examples/GRID_example'.
After the whole calculations finished, the phonon frequencies of Gamma point
are shown below:
###################################################
&plot nbnd= 6, nks= 161 /
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
-0.0000 -0.0000 -0.0000 375.5206 375.5206 410.5615
.
.
###################################################
The input file is
###################################################
&input
asr='simple',
flfrc='AlAs.fc',
flfrq='AlAs.freq',
flvec='AlAs.modes',
q_in_band_form=.true.,
amass(1)=26.98,
amass(2)=74.92,
/
6
0.000 0.0 0.0 40
1.0 0.0 0.0 20
1.0 0.5 0.0 20
1.0 1.0 0.0 40
0.00 0.0 0.0 40
0.5 0.5 0.5 1
###################################################
However, if I used the first dynamic matrix, which corresponds to that of
Gamma point, and do phonon calculation for Gamma point via dynmat.x with the
input file:
###################################################
&input
fildyn='AlAs.dynG', asr='simple',
fileig='AlAs.eigfile', filout='AlAs.normal'
amass(1)=26.98,
amass(2)=74.92,
/
###################################################
The output file is
###################################################
Program DYNMAT v.6.8 starts on 3Feb2022 at 16:54:12
This program is part of the open-source Quantum ESPRESSO suite
for quantum simulation of materials; please cite
"P. Giannozzi et al., J. Phys.:Condens. Matter 21 395502 (2009);
"P. Giannozzi et al., J. Phys.:Condens. Matter 29 465901 (2017);
"P. Giannozzi et al., J. Chem. Phys. 152 154105 (2020);
URL http://www.quantum-espresso.org",
in publications or presentations arising from this work. More details
at
http://www.quantum-espresso.org/quote
Parallel version (MPI & OpenMP), running on 4 processor cores
Number of MPI processes: 4
Threads/MPI process: 1
MPI processes distributed on 1 nodes
R & G space division: proc/nbgrp/npool/nimage = 4
121728 MiB available memory on the printing compute node when the
environment starts
Reading Dynamical Matrix from file AlAs.dynG
...Force constants read
...epsilon and Z* read
A direction for q was not specified:TO-LO splitting will be absent
Polarizability (A^3 units)
multiply by 0.190550 for Clausius-Mossotti correction
43.491364 0.000000 -0.000000
0.000000 43.491364 0.000000
-0.000000 0.000000 43.491364
IR activities are in (D/A)^2/amu units
# mode [cm-1] [THz] IR
1 -0.00 -0.0000 0.0000
2 0.00 0.0000 0.0000
3 0.00 0.0000 0.0000
4 375.52 11.2578 7.6122
5 375.52 11.2578 7.6122
6 375.52 11.2578 7.6122
DYNMAT : 0.01s CPU 0.03s WALL
This run was terminated on: 16:54:12 3Feb2022
=---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---=
JOB DONE.
=---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---=
###################################################
The highest phonon frequencies (375.52 cm $^{-1}$ vs 410.5615 cm $^{-1}$)
differ a lot.
Could anyone please tell me why there is such a hug difference? And how to
eliminate the difference?
I also tried calculations on other materials, the single point phonon
calculation at Gamma point gives no imaginary frequencies while when doing
the full phonon dispersion calculations, there exist huge imaginary
frequencies at Gamma point.
Best regards
Zhishuo Huang
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20220203/d8db61b9/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list