[QE-users] Differences between projwfc.dat and atomic_proj.xml
Léo Gaspard
leo.gaspard at outlook.fr
Thu Apr 14 17:30:10 CEST 2022
Dear Paolo,
Thank you for your answer, I would have two more questions concerning
the projections written in the xml file.
First, even if they are not symmetrized, could I still use the square of
their norm to plot the fatbands ?
Second, I am interested in doing some rotations between the projections
in order to see the projection on an effective state (namely the Jeff
spin orbit states in the TP approximation). But when I do so, I find
that the results are not what I expect them to be. I am award that some
codes add or remove a phase factor from the projections, and I was
wondering if maybe the projections from QuantumEspresso were doing the
same thing.
Best regards,
Léo Gaspard
Le 07/04/2022 à 12:29, Paolo Giannozzi a écrit :
> It seems to me that in the output we print the the square of the
> projections, symmetrized, while the xml file contains the projections,
> not squared and not symmetrized
>
> Paolo
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 4:38 PM Léo Gaspard <leo.gaspard at outlook.fr> wrote:
>
> Sorry I forgot to add the files, they are attached in this mail
> (the pseudo are the SC pseudo from PseudoDojo with PBE functional).
>
> I noticed that it happens only for bands that are degenerate.
> Could it be that the program does a rotation to print the
> proj.dat.projwfc_up file and not for the atomic_proj.xml ?
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Léo Gaspard
>
> Le 06/04/2022 à 14:55, Paolo Giannozzi a écrit :
>> Please provide an example that can be reproduced of the
>> discrepancies you observe
>>
>> Paolo
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 3:07 PM Léo Gaspard
>> <leo.gaspard at outlook.fr> wrote:
>>
>> Dear QuantumEspresso users and developers,
>>
>>
>> I am trying to parse the atomic_proj.xml file in order to get
>> the
>> projections of the wavefunction on the atomic orbitals. I
>> then computed
>> the weight and compared it to the one reported in the
>> 'proj.dat.projwfc_up' file generated by projwfc.x (QE version
>> 6.8).
>>
>> For some projections it worked very well, but for other it
>> did not and
>> the weight was very different.
>>
>> As an example, the projection on the 3rd atomic wavefunction
>> for the 1st
>> k-point and 12th band is -0.100392648675825
>> -0.08369317912931304i ,
>> which gives a weight of ~0.0171 whereas in the
>> 'proj.dat.projwfc_up'
>> file, the weight written is 0.2336877541.
>>
>>
>> Is there any explanation as to why these two values are not
>> the same in
>> both files ?
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Léo Gaspard,
>>
>> PhD Student, LCPQ - Toulouse
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> The Quantum ESPRESSO community stands by the Ukrainian
>> people and expresses its concerns about the devastating
>> effects that the Russian military offensive has on their
>> country and on the free and peaceful scientific, cultural,
>> and economic cooperation amongst peoples
>> _______________________________________________
>> Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu
>> <http://www.max-centre.eu>)
>> users mailing list users at lists.quantum-espresso.org
>> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Paolo Giannozzi, Dip. Scienze Matematiche Informatiche e Fisiche,
>> Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 206, 33100 Udine, Italy
>> Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222
>>
>
>
> --
> Paolo Giannozzi, Dip. Scienze Matematiche Informatiche e Fisiche,
> Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 206, 33100 Udine, Italy
> Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20220414/746be960/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list