[QE-users] Query for skip_type and equiv_type for DFT+U+V
Dr. K. C. Bhamu
kcbhamu85 at gmail.com
Wed Nov 24 13:00:13 CET 2021
Dear Dr. Iurii (😊),
The ATOMIC_POSITIONS cart of my structure (ferrimagnetic system with ntyp =
3 ) is
ATOMIC_POSITIONS (crystal)
Fe1 0.0000000000 -0.0000000000 -0.0000000000 (four
times)
Fe2 0.3749993721 0.3749993349 0.3750019210 (two
times)
O 0.2454868415 0.2454868399 0.2454949640 (eight
times)
Previously, based on ATOMIC_SPECIES cart, I defined my Hubbard tag as below
Hubbard_V(1,1,1) = 1.d-8
Hubbard_V(2,2,1) = 1.d-8
Hubbard_V(3,3,1) = 1.d-8
In the hp output file, I saw that only one Fe1 atom was perturbed.
Then I defined below Hubbard tags according to ATOMIC_POSITIONS cart as
Hubbard_V(1,1,1) = 1.d-8
Hubbard_V(5,5,1) = 1.d-8
Hubbard_V(7,7,1) = 1.d-8
which perturbed four atoms
1 Fe1 55.8450 tau( 1) = ( 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 )
4 Fe1 55.8450 tau( 4) = ( 1.75000 1.01036 0.40825 )
5 Fe2 55.8450 tau( 5) = ( 0.75000 0.43301 0.30619 )
7 O 15.9994 tau( 7) = ( 0.49098 0.28347 0.20045 )
As all Fe will have the same Hubbard parameter (as reported in the
literature for the same system), I would like to skip the perturbation for
atom Fe1(4) and Fe2(5).
Is it okay if I do so?
To skip the perturbation for Fe1(4) and Fe2(5), I have updated below tags
in my hp input file:
skip_type(1)=.true.
skip_type(2)=.true.
equiv_type(1)=1
equiv_type(2)=1
disable_type_analysis=.true.,
Could you please correct me if this modification is correct or not?
Sorry for the list of questions. But I am sure, my these queries will be
helpful for others too.
Thanks and regards
K C Bhamu
Postdoctoral Fellow
University of Ulsan
South Korea
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20211124/76a9fd53/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list