[QE-users] Error in scf calculation of large number of atoms

[박민규]

Dear Pooja,

Try to check your structure again.
It does not look like a supercell,
because you did not change the lattice constant accordingly.

Best,
==================================================
Minkyu Park
Research Institute of Basic Sciences, University of Ulsan,
93, Daehak-ro, Nam-gu, Ulsan, 44610 Republic of Korea
minkyupark at ulsan.ac.kr<mailto:minkyupark at ulsan.ac.kr>
+82-52-259-1473
==================================================

On 4 Mar 2021, at 6:16 PM, Pooja Vyas <poojavyas595 at gmail.com<mailto:poojavyas595 at gmail.com>> wrote:

All details are in input files. How do I solve this problem?

On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 2:44 PM sally issa <sally.issa1 at outlook.com<mailto:sally.issa1 at outlook.com>> wrote:
I have the same calcul with 128 atoms, sometimes it appears this error but I change the K mesh or the periodic condition are not good one.
What you use for k point?

On 4 Mar 2021, at 09:57, Pooja Vyas <poojavyas595 at gmail.com<mailto:poojavyas595 at gmail.com>> wrote:


Dear users,
I have an input script (scf1.in<http://scf1.in/> attached below) of CaO with 2 atoms. It runs fine for scf calculation.
I want to compute the energy of CaO with 64 atoms. So I opened scf1.in<http://scf1.in/> file in XCrysden so it displayed 27 atoms and then I followed the below steps:
1) Display->Unit of repetition -> translational asymmetric unit
2) Above step reduced 27 atoms to 4 Ca and 4 O atoms totalling 8.
3) Then I followed Modify->number of units drawn and selected 2,2,2 in it. So, it displayed 8 atoms*(2*2*2)= 64 atoms.

I took these atomic positions and made the file scf2.in<http://scf2.in/> attached below. But on running that script for scf calculation, it shows me the following error:

 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
     task #         1
     from check_atoms : error #         1
     atoms #   1 and #   2 differ by lattice vector (-1, 1, 0) in crystal axis
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

The error is due to overlapping of atoms. But can anyone let me know how I can compute the energy of 64 atoms? How do I figure out the equivalent atomic positions which causes this error?


<scf1.in<http://scf1.in/>>
<scf2.in<http://scf2.in/>>
_______________________________________________
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu<http://www.max-centre.eu/>)
users mailing list users at lists.quantum-espresso.org<mailto:users at lists.quantum-espresso.org>
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu<http://www.max-centre.eu/>)
users mailing list users at lists.quantum-espresso.org<mailto:users at lists.quantum-espresso.org>
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu<http://www.max-centre.eu>)
users mailing list users at lists.quantum-espresso.org<mailto:users at lists.quantum-espresso.org>
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20210304/ae933b8c/attachment.html>