[QE-users] How to extract the px, py, pz, dz2, ....contributions with SOC from projdos out
Thomas Brumme
tbrumme at msx.tu-dresden.de
Sun Jul 4 14:24:10 CEST 2021
Dear Elie,
The short answer is: You can't!
Spin-orbit interaction couples the orbital angular momentum with the
spin momentum and thus neither l or s are good quantum number anymore.
You now have to use the total angular momentum J. Sure, a lot of people
still use the nomenclature from the non-SOC calculations, such as
speaking in the case of 2D TMDCs of dz² states at the K point, but
strictly speaking this is not correct. If you really want to understand
the relation between J and L in detail, I can recommend the paper by
Andrea Dal Corso and Adriano Mosca Conte, Phys. Rev. B 71, 115106 (2005)
(https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.71.115106) which nicely shows
which spherical harmonics are included in which spin-angle functions for
which total angular momentum j. If I remember this correctly (some time
ago that I did this and I can't find the table anymore) the states with
higher mj (+-3/2 and +- 5/2) have more in-plane characterfor both j=3/5
and j=5/2 (i.e., the contain terms with spherical harmonics which are
usually combined such that the result is in the xy-plane) while the
states with mj=+-1/2 have more out-of-plane character (z direction). But
I could be wrong here since I don't have the details anymore.
The only option for you - if you don't want to check the paper or if
this is too much and if nobody else comments here - is to do a non-SOC
calculation and then hope that SOC is not mixing states too much and you
can still call the result, e.g., dz² like. OR you plot the corresponding
wave function in real space and decide by "looking" at the form of |psi|².
Regards
Thomas
P.S.: another detail concerning, e.g., the states at K in a WS2
monolayer - is this your system? :)
The states are not simple split into spin up and spin down even if a lot
of people use this nomenclature. For the valence band the two SOC-split
bands are to nearly 100% spin up or down but not for the conduction band
where you won't have states which are 100% up or down, even if there is
no in-plane contribution... Some details can also be found here:
https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.235408
On 7/4/21 6:52 AM, Elio Physics wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am studying the contribution of the orbitals to the bands of a
> structure, in the presence of spin orbit coupling. At the beginning of
> the projwfc.x output file, I got:
>
> state # 1: atom 1 (S ), wfc 1 (l=0 j=0.5 m_j=-0.5)
> state # 2: atom 1 (S ), wfc 1 (l=0 j=0.5 m_j= 0.5)
> state # 3: atom 1 (S ), wfc 2 (l=1 j=0.5 m_j=-0.5)
> state # 4: atom 1 (S ), wfc 2 (l=1 j=0.5 m_j= 0.5)
> state # 5: atom 1 (S ), wfc 3 (l=1 j=1.5 m_j=-1.5)
> state # 6: atom 1 (S ), wfc 3 (l=1 j=1.5 m_j=-0.5)
> state # 7: atom 1 (S ), wfc 3 (l=1 j=1.5 m_j= 0.5)
> state # 8: atom 1 (S ), wfc 3 (l=1 j=1.5 m_j= 1.5)
> .
> .
> .
> state # 39: atom 5 (W ), wfc 3 (l=2 j=1.5 m_j=-1.5)
> state # 40: atom 5 (W), wfc 3 (l=2 j=1.5 m_j=-0.5)
> state # 41: atom 5 (W), wfc 3 (l=2 j=1.5 m_j= 0.5)
> state # 42: atom 5 (W), wfc 3 (l=2 j=1.5 m_j= 1.5)
> state # 43: atom 5 (W ), wfc 4 (l=2 j=2.5 m_j=-2.5)
> state # 44: atom 5 (W ), wfc 4 (l=2 j=2.5 m_j=-1.5)
> state # 45: atom 5 (W), wfc 4 (l=2 j=2.5 m_j=-0.5)
> state # 46: atom 5 (W), wfc 4 (l=2 j=2.5 m_j= 0.5)
> state # 47: atom 5 (W), wfc 4 (l=2 j=2.5 m_j= 1.5)
>
> The l=1 wavefunctions are the p contributions. But How can we
> specifically identify which one is px, py and pz?
> Similary, how to identify which ones of the 10 d orbitals are the dz^2
> for example
>
> regards
>
> Elie
> Federal Universiy of Rondonia
> Brazil
>
> _______________________________________________
> Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
> users mailing list users at lists.quantum-espresso.org
> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Dr. rer. nat. Thomas Brumme
Theoretical chemistry
TU Dresden - BAR / II49
Helmholtzstr. 18
01069 Dresden
Tel: +49 (0)351 463 40844
email: thomas.brumme at tu-dresden.de
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20210704/8778e7b9/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list