[QE-users] CrI3 showed wrong symmetry in optimization
Pietro Delugas
pdelugas at sissa.it
Tue Sep 29 09:42:56 CEST 2020
Hi your positions are slightly displaced w.r.t the full symmetric ones.
not that slightly in fact. Using lattice vectors use by pw for ibrav=4
Cr positions should be something like
(1/3,2/3,c) and (2/3,1/3, c)
And I positions
(x, 0, c-z), (1-x, 1-x, c-z), (0,x,c-z)
And
(1-x,0,c+z), (x,x,c+z), (0,1-x, c+z)
Hope it helps
Pietro
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: wang1968000
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2020 8:23 AM
To: users
Subject: [QE-users] CrI3 showed wrong symmetry in optimization
Dear QE users,
Thank you for your help.
I built a monolayer CrI3 structure. However, in the scf calculation, it only find 2 symmetry operation. For monolayer CrI3, it should belong to D3d point group and have 12 symmetry operactions.
Here I attached my input file. Please help me check. Thank you very much for your help.
&control
calculation = 'vc-relax'
verbosity = 'high'
restart_mode = 'from_scratch'
nstep = 200
tstress = .true.
tprnfor = .true.
etot_conv_thr = 1.0E-6
forc_conv_thr = 1.0D-5
pseudo_dir = '../pp'
outdir = './tmp/'
prefix = 'cri3'
/
&system
ibrav = 4
nat = 8
ntyp = 2
a = 7.0075147400
c = 21.3942330000
nbnd = 80
ecutwfc = 180
/
&electrons
conv_thr = 1.0d-8
mixing_beta = 0.10
/
&ions
ion_dynamics = 'bfgs'
/
&cell
cell_dynamics = 'bfgs'
press_conv_thr = 0.01
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
Cr 51.996 Cr.pz-spn-rrkjus_psl.1.0.0.UPF
I 126.9045 I.pz-n-rrkjus_psl.0.2.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS {crystal}
Cr 0.0000000000 1.0000000000 0.5000000000
Cr 0.3329150000 0.6670850000 0.5000000000
I 0.3075660000 0.9749650000 0.4266410000
I 0.0250350000 0.6924340000 0.5733590000
I 0.6663520000 0.6927290000 0.4267060000
I 0.3072710000 0.3336480000 0.5732940000
I 0.6662030000 0.9747290000 0.5735640000
I 0.0252710000 0.3337970000 0.4264360000
K_POINTS {automatic}
8 8 1 0 0 0
Wang
Department of Physics
Tohoku University
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20200929/6691afb4/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list