[QE-users] SCAN functional in QE-6.5
Lorenzo Paulatto
paulatz at gmail.com
Tue May 26 11:24:27 CEST 2020
> Your suggestion (input_dft = 'MGGA_X_SCAN MGGA_C_SCAN') worked.
"Got the code to spit out a number" is not the same as "produced a valid
result". I would wait for an answer from someone knowledgeable on this
subject before spending too much CPU time in this case!
Or even better open an issue in the gitlab tracker
<https://gitlab.com/QEF/q-e/-/issues> explaining why do you think that
two equivalent cases are producing different outcomes. This was you'll
have an answer for sure
cheers
> However, I still don't understand why others could use (input_dft =
> 'scan') without any problem - I searched archive and saw several
> examples. Also, I used SCAN pseudopotentials from QE website, so in
> principle I shouldn't declare input_dft option. And not declaring would
> result in error (as I reported).
> Thanks,
> Sergey Lisenkov
> 26.05.2020, 10:36, "Fabrizio Ferrari" <ferrariruffino.fz at gmail.com>:
>
> Hello Sergey,
> that is strange. I have tried some simple tests too, but I could not
> reproduce your issue. An equivalent way to activate the scan mgga
> functionals is to put: input_dft = 'MGGA_X_SCAN MGGA_C_SCAN'
> You can try with that, but if it still doesn't work, I think I would
> need more details about your input in order to find the issue.
> Cheers
> On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 8:16 PM Sergey Lisenkov <proffess at yandex.ru
> <mailto:proffess at yandex.ru>> wrote:
>
> Hello Fabrizio,
> yes, it is compiled with libxc support. Without it, pw.x
> complains immediately, that it should be compiled with Libxc
> library (or something like that).
> 25.05.2020, 17:21, "Fabrizio Ferrari"
> <ferrariruffino.fz at gmail.com <mailto:ferrariruffino.fz at gmail.com>>:
>
> Hello,
> in your case (scan) that error should come out only if libxc
> has not been properly linked during compilation. Have you
> tried runs with other libxc functionals (not necessarily
> mGGA)? Do they work?
> Just in case you want to check, to properly compile with
> libxc, after the qe configuration, you have to add the
> requested flags in the make.inc file at 'DFLAGS', 'IFLAGS'
> and 'LD_LIBS' (you can follow the nearby comments).
> Fabrizio
> On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 1:28 PM Sergey Lisenkov
> <proffess at yandex.ru <mailto:proffess at yandex.ru>> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I noticed that some people run SCAN calculations with QE
> v.6.5. I tried this, but my test has failed.
> I compiled 6.5 version with LibXC-4.3.4. When I activate
> "input_dft = 'scan'" in my input file,
> I get the following error just before first scf step:
> ....
> total cpu time spent up to now is 1.0 secs
> Self-consistent Calculation
> iteration # 1 ecut= 100.00 Ry beta= 0.70
> Davidson diagonalization with overlap
> ethr = 1.00E-05, avg # of iterations = 14.0
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> Error in routine tau_xc (5):
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> This case is not implemented
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> Error in routine tau_xc (5):
> This case is not implemented
> Error in routine tau_xc (5):
> Am I missing something? It is simple "scf" calculation
> with ONCVPSP pseudopotentials.I even tried SCAN pseudo
> without 'input_dft' option and still got the same error.
> Thanks,
> Sergey
> University of South Florida.
> _______________________________________________
> Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX
> (www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso
> <http://www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso>)
> users mailing list users at lists.quantum-espresso.org
> <mailto:users at lists.quantum-espresso.org>
> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> ,
>
> _______________________________________________
> Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX
> (www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso
> <http://www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso>)
> users mailing list users at lists.quantum-espresso.org
> <mailto:users at lists.quantum-espresso.org>
> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX
> (www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso
> <http://www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso>)
> users mailing list users at lists.quantum-espresso.org
> <mailto:users at lists.quantum-espresso.org>
> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> ,
>
> _______________________________________________
> Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX
> (www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso
> <http://www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso>)
> users mailing list users at lists.quantum-espresso.org
> <mailto:users at lists.quantum-espresso.org>
> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso)
> users mailing list users at lists.quantum-espresso.org
> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
--
Lorenzo Paulatto - Paris
More information about the users
mailing list