[QE-users] One bug of pw2wannier90 in parallel execution
박민규
minkyupark at ulsan.ac.kr
Mon Mar 9 16:44:50 CET 2020
Dear all,
I attach the result of example11 of wannier90 for saving time to reproduce the problem.
This is what I hope to get and is obtained without any option,
Extraction of optimally-connected subspace
------------------------------------------
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+<-- DIS
| Iter Omega_I(i-1) Omega_I(i) Delta (frac.) Time |<-- DIS
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+<-- DIS
1 20.71708776 20.71708776 0.000E+00 0.00 <-- DIS
2 20.71708776 20.71708776 0.000E+00 0.00 <-- DIS
3 20.71708776 20.71708776 0.000E+00 0.00 <-- DIS
<<< Delta < 1.000E-10 over 3 iterations >>>
<<< Disentanglement convergence criteria satisfied >>>
Final Omega_I 20.71708776 (Bohr^2)
If I use -nb 2 option, I instead get
Extraction of optimally-connected subspace
------------------------------------------
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+<-- DIS
| Iter Omega_I(i-1) Omega_I(i) Delta (frac.) Time |<-- DIS
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+<-- DIS
1 -425.57456453 -425.57456453 -1.110E-16 0.00 <-- DIS
2 -425.57456453 -425.57456453 -1.110E-16 0.00 <-- DIS
3 -425.57456453 -425.57456453 -1.110E-16 0.00 <-- DIS
<<< Delta < 1.000E-10 over 3 iterations >>>
<<< Disentanglement convergence criteria satisfied >>>
Final Omega_I -425.57456453 (Bohr^2)
Furthermore, If I use -nb 12 I get
Extraction of optimally-connected subspace
------------------------------------------
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+<-- DIS
| Iter Omega_I(i-1) Omega_I(i) Delta (frac.) Time |<-- DIS
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+<-- DIS
1 ************** ************** 0.000E+00 0.00 <-- DIS
2 ************** ************** 0.000E+00 0.00 <-- DIS
3 ************** ************** 0.000E+00 0.00 <-- DIS
<<< Delta < 1.000E-10 over 3 iterations >>>
<<< Disentanglement convergence criteria satisfied >>>
Final Omega_I ************** (Bohr^2)
============================================
Minkyu Park
Research Institute of Basic Sciences, University of Ulsan,
Republic of Korea
============================================
On 9 Mar 2020, at 11:53 PM, 박민규 <minkyupark at ulsan.ac.kr<mailto:minkyupark at ulsan.ac.kr>> wrote:
Dear all users,
Although this might be already known, I want to report my observation in case someone has the same problem but cannot find any hint.
I found that if nband (or nb) option is used in pw2wannier90 step, wannier90 incorrectly gives negative values for Omega_I which is positive quantity by definition. The values also depend on how many cores I used.
I used following command after scf and nscf calculations (you can try to reproduce simply using e.g. example11 of wannier90)
mpirun -n 36 ~/wannier90-3.1.0/wannier90.x -pp wannier
mpirun -n 36 ~/qe-6.5/bin/pw2wannier90.x -nb 3 -nt 3 -in pw2wan.in > pw2wan.out
mpirun -n 36 ~/wannier90-3.1.0/wannier90.x wannier
Someone already reported this negative Omega_I problem long time ago in a different context:
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/wannier/2008-September/000196.html
If I change second one (pw2wannier90.x) to this
mpirun -n 36 ~/qe-6.5/bin/pw2wannier90.x -nt 3 -in pw2wan.in > pw2wan.out
Omega_I has positive value and does not depend on how many cores I used.
Actually nt option does not change the computation time much.
I guess it is good to add an error or warning message like the error message when nk option is used:
Error in routine pw2wannier90 (9):
pools not implemented
Best regards,
============================================
Minkyu Park
Research Institute of Basic Sciences, University of Ulsan,
Republic of Korea
============================================
_______________________________________________
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso<http://www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso>)
users mailing list users at lists.quantum-espresso.org<mailto:users at lists.quantum-espresso.org>
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20200309/8e6cf269/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list