[QE-users] Problem with hp.x for f-metals

Abhirup Patra abhirupp at sas.upenn.edu
Mon Jul 27 17:00:12 CEST 2020


Great! Thanks, Iurii, I will try these suggestions and let you know. By the
way, for a unit cell with 4 atoms, I was able to find the Hubbard U using
the previous input settings I shared with you, the problem merely happens
for a 32 atoms supercell.

The PP is from Opium code, I can try the other PP's as well.

Best,
Abhirup
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Abhirup Patra
Postdoctoral Research Fellow
Department of Chemistry
University of Pennsylvania


On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 4:30 AM Timrov Iurii <iurii.timrov at epfl.ch> wrote:

> Dear Abhirup,
>
>
> > calculation = 'relax'
>
>
> The HP code must be run after a SCF calculation, i.e. calculation = 'scf'.
>
>
> > input_dft = 'PBE'
>
>
> No need to specify this in the input
>
>
> > degauss = 0.05
>
>
> This is too large, try degauss = 0.02
>
>
> > conv_thr = 1.0D-6
>
>
> This is too large, try e.g. conv_thr = 1.0D-10
>
>
> > diago_thr_init = 1e-08
>
>
> I suggest to remove this, and the default will be used
>
>
> > diagonalization = 'cg'
>
>
> I would not use this, try diagonalization = 'david'
>
>
> > ce_srl_gga.upf
>
>
> I do not know this pseudopotential. Is it good? Where did you take it
> from? I suggest to have a look here:
> https://www.materialscloud.org/discover/sssp/table/efficiency
>
>
> Finally, I suggest to try the QE input generator:
> https://www.materialscloud.org/work/tools/qeinputgenerator
>
>
> Greetings,
>
> Iurii
>
>
> --
> Dr. Iurii Timrov
> Postdoctoral Researcher
> STI - IMX - THEOS and NCCR - MARVEL
> Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL)
> CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
> +41 21 69 34 881
> http://people.epfl.ch/265334
> ------------------------------
> *From:* users <users-bounces at lists.quantum-espresso.org> on behalf of
> Abhirup Patra <abhirupp at sas.upenn.edu>
> *Sent:* Saturday, July 25, 2020 7:41:52 AM
> *To:* Quantum ESPRESSO users Forum
> *Subject:* Re: [QE-users] Problem with hp.x for f-metals
>
> Hi Iurii,
>
> Thanks for your prompt reply. Here they are:
> 1.PW
> ------------------------------------------------------
> &CONTROL
>                        title = 'POSCAR_Ce_alpha_supercell'
>                  calculation = 'relax'
>                 restart_mode = 'from_scratch'
>                       outdir = './'
>                   pseudo_dir = './'
>                       prefix = 'POSCAR_Ce_alpha_supercell'
>                    verbosity = 'high'
>                etot_conv_thr = 0.0001
>                forc_conv_thr = 0.001
>                        nstep = 400
>                      tprnfor = .true.
>  /
>  &SYSTEM
>                   ibrav = 0
>                          nat = 32
>                         ntyp = 1
>                         input_dft = 'PBE'
>                      ecutwfc = 80
>                      ecutrho = 320
>                      lda_plus_u = .true.,
>                      lda_plus_u_kind = 0,
>                    !  U_projection_type = 'atomic',
>                      Hubbard_U(1) = 2.00
>                      occupations = 'smearing',
>                      smearing = 'gaussian' ,
>                       degauss = 0.05
> /
>  &ELECTRONS
>             electron_maxstep = 200
>                     conv_thr = 1.0D-6
>               diago_thr_init = 1e-08
>                  mixing_mode = 'local-TF'
>                  mixing_beta = 0.7
>              diagonalization = 'cg'
>  /
> &IONS
>                 ion_dynamics = 'bfgs'
>  /
>
> ATOMIC_SPECIES
>    Ce 140.11600000   ce_srl_gga.upf
> ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal
> Ce      0.00000000000000      0.00000000000000      0.00000000000000
> Ce      0.00000000000000      0.00000000000000      0.50000000000000
> Ce      0.00000000000000      0.50000000000000      0.00000000000000
> Ce      0.00000000000000      0.50000000000000      0.50000000000000
> Ce      0.50000000000000      0.00000000000000      0.00000000000000
> Ce      0.50000000000000      0.00000000000000      0.50000000000000
> Ce      0.50000000000000      0.50000000000000      0.00000000000000
> Ce      0.50000000000000      0.50000000000000      0.50000000000000
> Ce      0.00000000000000      0.25000000000000      0.25000000000000
> Ce      0.00000000000000      0.25000000000000      0.75000000000000
> Ce      0.00000000000000      0.75000000000000      0.25000000000000
> Ce      0.00000000000000      0.75000000000000      0.75000000000000
> Ce      0.50000000000000      0.25000000000000      0.25000000000000
> Ce      0.50000000000000      0.25000000000000      0.75000000000000
> Ce      0.50000000000000      0.75000000000000      0.25000000000000
> Ce      0.50000000000000      0.75000000000000      0.75000000000000
> Ce      0.25000000000000      0.00000000000000      0.25000000000000
> Ce      0.25000000000000      0.00000000000000      0.75000000000000
> Ce      0.25000000000000      0.50000000000000      0.25000000000000
> Ce      0.25000000000000      0.50000000000000      0.75000000000000
> Ce      0.75000000000000      0.00000000000000      0.25000000000000
> Ce      0.75000000000000      0.00000000000000      0.75000000000000
> Ce      0.75000000000000      0.50000000000000      0.25000000000000
> Ce      0.75000000000000      0.50000000000000      0.75000000000000
> Ce      0.25000000000000      0.25000000000000      0.00000000000000
> Ce      0.25000000000000      0.25000000000000      0.50000000000000
> Ce      0.25000000000000      0.75000000000000      0.00000000000000
> Ce      0.25000000000000      0.75000000000000      0.50000000000000
> Ce      0.75000000000000      0.25000000000000      0.00000000000000
> Ce      0.75000000000000      0.25000000000000      0.50000000000000
> Ce      0.75000000000000      0.75000000000000      0.00000000000000
> Ce      0.75000000000000      0.75000000000000      0.50000000000000
>
> K_POINTS automatic
> 2 2 2   0 0 0
>
> CELL_PARAMETERS {bohr}
>     18.23207773008069      0.00000000000000      0.00000000000000
>      0.00000000000000     18.23207773008069      0.00000000000000
>      0.00000000000000      0.00000000000000     18.23207773008069
>
> 2. HP
> ----------------------------------------------------
>  &inputhp
>    prefix = 'POSCAR_Ce_alpha_supercell',
>    outdir = './',
>    nq1 = 2, nq2 = 2, nq3 = 2,
>    conv_thr_chi = 1.0d-05,
>    thresh_init  = 1.0d-10
>    niter_max = 400
>    iverbosity = 2
>    perturb_only_atom(1) = .true.
>  /
> I hope this will be of help.
>
> Best,
> Abhirup
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Abhirup Patra
> Postdoctoral Research Fellow
> Department of Chemistry
> University of Pennsylvania
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 1:25 AM Timrov Iurii <iurii.timrov at epfl.ch> wrote:
>
>> Could you provide the input and output files for PW and HP calculations?
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Iurii
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Iurii Timrov
>> Postdoctoral Researcher
>> STI - IMX - THEOS and NCCR - MARVEL
>> Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL)
>> CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
>> +41 21 69 34 881
>> http://people.epfl.ch/265334
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* users <users-bounces at lists.quantum-espresso.org> on behalf of
>> Abhirup Patra <abhirupp at sas.upenn.edu>
>> *Sent:* Saturday, July 25, 2020 6:20:09 AM
>> *To:* Quantum ESPRESSO users Forum
>> *Subject:* [QE-users] Problem with hp.x for f-metals
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am trying to compute Hubbard U using hp.x for Cerium, however, it seems
>> that after few iterations the code stopped with the following message:
>>
>>      atom #  1   q point #   1   iter # 395
>>       Fermi energy shift (Ry) = -0.5530E+01 -0.2375E-07
>>
>>       WARNING: The Fermi energy shift is too big!
>>       This may happen in two cases:
>>       1. The DOS at the Fermi level is too small:
>>          DOS(E_Fermi) =    0.1303E+04
>>          This means that most likely the system has a gap,
>>          and hence it should NOT be treated as a metal
>>          (otherwise numerical instabilities will appear).
>>       2. Numerical instabilities due to too low cutoff
>>          for hard pseudopotentials.
>>
>>       Stopping...
>>
>> Any help would be appreciated.
>>
>> Best,
>> Abhirup
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Abhirup Patra
>> Postdoctoral Research Fellow
>> Department of Chemistry
>> University of Pennsylvania
>> _______________________________________________
>> Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso)
>> users mailing list users at lists.quantum-espresso.org
>> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso)
> users mailing list users at lists.quantum-espresso.org
> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20200727/c1e6c1b9/attachment.html>


More information about the users mailing list