[QE-users] band gap of bilayer graphene
    Roozbeh Anvari 
    roozbeh.anvari at gmail.com
       
    Thu Dec 31 12:22:02 CET 2020
    
    
  
Dear QuantumEspresso users,
I am trying to calculate the maximally localised wannier functions of
defective bilayer graphene using quantumEspresso and Wannier90 codes,
however I am getting a band gap of about 40 to 60 meV for pristine bilayer
graphene using  a variety of NCPP+LDA and NCPP+PBE, the band gap and the
interlayer distance are slightly improved (10 meV and 0.1 A ) after
applying DFT-D3 but not significantly, I wonder how I can fix this issue
(please see the sample setup that follows) ?
Please also note that I get an ideal zero band gap when using ultrasoft
pseudopotential but it seems that Wannier90 has a preference for NCPP and I
cannot get a nice fit to the band structure calculated using USPP,
Best regards,
Roozbeh Anvari,
PDF, Physics Dept, Queen's University, Canada
Here is a shortened sample of the setup I use for  vc-relax/scf calculations
&CONTROL
...
 forc_conv_thr=1.0d-6,
&SYSTEM
...
occupations='smearing', smearing='cold', degauss=0.02
vdw_corr='grimme-d3' , input_dft='PBE'
&ELECTRONS
startingwfc='random', diagonalization='cg', conv_thr = 1.0e-12
mixing_beta = 0.2
/
 &IONS
 ion_dynamics='bfgs',  upscale=20.0
&CELL
 press_conv_thr = 0.5D0,  press = 0.D0
cell_dynamics = 'bfgs',cell_dofree = '2Dxy',  cell_factor = 1.5D0
ATOMIC_SPECIES
C  12.011   C.pbe-mt_gipaw_NC_PBE.UPF
K_POINTS automatic
36 36 1 0 0 0
Cheers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20201231/cc56b656/attachment.html>
    
    
More information about the users
mailing list