[QE-users] U calculation, different projection type

[Timrov Iurii]

Dear Sergey,


As Lorenzo said, yes this is expected. Ab initio U depends on the Hubbard manifold, i.e. which projector functions are used (e.g. atomic, orthogonalized atomic, Wannier functions, you name it). So it is absolutely important to report in papers which projector functions were used for the calculation of U. In particular, this is why one should be very careful when comparing U values from different papers. There are also other factors that influence the value of U (pseudopotentials, oxidation state, functional, one-shot or self-consistent calculation). We have some papers in preparation on this topic, which hopefully would clarify a bit more these points. You can also check this web page: http://theossrv1.epfl.ch/Main/DFTHubbard


Greetings,

Iurii


--
Dr. Iurii TIMROV
Postdoctoral Researcher
STI - IMX - THEOS and NCCR - MARVEL
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL)
CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
+41 21 69 34 881
http://people.epfl.ch/265334
________________________________
From: users <users-bounces at lists.quantum-espresso.org> on behalf of Lorenzo Paulatto <paulatz at gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2020 10:59:13 AM
To: users at lists.quantum-espresso.org
Subject: Re: [QE-users] U calculation, different projection type

> Is it expected behavior?

Yes,
kind regards

> Thanks,
>   Sergey

--
Lorenzo Paulatto - Paris
_______________________________________________
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso<http://www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso>)
users mailing list users at lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20200826/e867b983/attachment.html>