[QE-users] The relationship between bands and nscf.
Mona Asadinamin
Mona.a at uga.edu
Sat Aug 8 18:09:58 CEST 2020
Hi;
I have checked both for my systems and have not seen any differences, as long as the kpoints are converged enough in the sci calculations.
Best regards;
Mona Asadi Namin
Graduate student
Center for simulational physics
University of Georgia
--------------------------------------
Email:mona.a at uga.ed<mailto:mona.a at uga.edu>u<mailto:mona.a at uga.edu>
Phone: +1-215-906-23-92
________________________________
From: users <users-bounces at lists.quantum-espresso.org> on behalf of Hongyi Zhao <hongyi.zhao at gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2020 7:50 AM
To: Quantum ESPRESSO users Forum <users at lists.quantum-espresso.org>
Subject: [QE-users] The relationship between bands and nscf.
[EXTERNAL SENDER - PROCEED CAUTIOUSLY]
Hi,
A dos calculation needs a previous nscf calculation, but this is not
the necessity for bands calculation.
So, my question is if I want to obtain band structure and dos of my
system, I can have the following two paths:
1. Path one:
(vc-)relax | scf --> bands
|___> nscf ( with denser k-points grid ) --> dos
1. Path two:
(vc-)relax | scf --> nscf ( with denser k-points grid ) --> bands
|____> dos
What's the differences between them and which path is preferable?
Best regards
--
Hongyi Zhao <hongyi.zhao at gmail.com>
_______________________________________________
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso<http://www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso>)
users mailing list users at lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20200808/4393ea5c/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list