[QE-users] dielectric constant calculation
Lorenzo Paulatto
paulatz at gmail.com
Tue Sep 17 08:55:55 CEST 2019
Graphene is a special material, you cannot just compute epsilon like
that. It is officially a metal, hence its static epsilon is infinity.
You should see that the better you do your calculation (i.e. more
k-points), the higher value you get.
Furthermore, its electric permittivity is strongly frequency dependent:
you would need some frequency-aware method to compute it. But I would
recommend you start with anything else instead.
cheers
On 9/16/19 11:55 PM, Jay Wai wrote:
> Dear users,
>
> I am trying to calculate dielectric constants of graphene.
> I first relaxed the structure using the following pw.x input:
>
> &CONTROL
> calculation = 'relax'
> tstress = .true.
> tprnfor = .true.
> prefix = 'noiso'
> forc_conv_thr = 1.d-4
> /
> &SYSTEM
> ibrav = 0
> ecutwfc = 64
> ecutrho = 576
> ntyp = 1
> nat = 8
> nosym = .true.
> /
> &ELECTRONS
> conv_thr=1.d-12
> /
>
> ATOMIC_SPECIES
> C 12.0 C.pbe-n-rrkjus.UPF
>
> K_POINTS automatic
> 12 12 1 0 0 0
>
> CELL_PARAMETERS angstrom
> 2.45951214674781 4.26000000000000 0.00000000000000
> -2.45951214674781 4.26000000000000 0.00000000000000
> 0.00000000000000 0.00000000000000 30.00000000000000
>
> ATOMIC_POSITIONS angstrom
> C 0.000000000 1.420000000 15.000000000
> C 0.000000000 2.840000000 15.000000000
> C -1.229756073 3.550000000 15.000000000
> C -1.229756073 4.970000000 15.000000000
> C 1.229756073 3.550000000 15.000000000
> C 1.229756073 4.970000000 15.000000000
> C 0.000000000 5.680000000 15.000000000
> C 0.000000000 7.100000000 15.000000000
>
> And then, I calculated the dielectric constants using the following ph.x
> input:
>
> phonons of gr
> &inputph
> tr2_ph=1.0d-14,
> prefix='noiso',
> epsil=.true.,
> ldisp=.true.,
> nq1=3,
> nq2=3,
> nq3=1,
> amass(1)=12,
> fildyn='noiso.dynG',
> /
>
> The result of calculation does not seem to be physically reasonable
> (very large negative value):
> Dielectric constant in cartesian axis
> ( -6123.274083490 0.000008052 -0.000001008 )
> ( 0.000008023 -6123.274129001 -0.000006809 )
> ( -0.000000922 -0.000006871 1.074380904 )
>
> Could you give me a clue on which part of my input files might cause this?
>
> Best,
> Jay
>
> _______________________________________________
> Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso)
> users mailing list users at lists.quantum-espresso.org
> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
--
Lorenzo Paulatto - Paris
More information about the users
mailing list