[QE-users] Gamma point phonon calculation is not consistent
wang1968000
wang1968000 at 163.com
Wed Oct 30 03:16:11 CET 2019
Hi. QE users.
I have calculate Gamma point phonon and phonon dispersion on black phosphorus.
But the phonon modes are not same in only Gamma point calculation and several q point calculations.
This is the results coming from only Gamma point calculation.
Diagonalizing the dynamical matrix
q = ( 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.000000000 )
**************************************************************************
freq ( 1) = -0.038897 [THz] = -1.297458 [cm-1]
freq ( 2) = -0.031677 [THz] = -1.056638 [cm-1]
freq ( 3) = 0.027926 [THz] = 0.931519 [cm-1]
freq ( 4) = 2.928955 [THz] = 97.699418 [cm-1]
freq ( 5) = 5.638698 [THz] = 188.086708 [cm-1]
freq ( 6) = 6.639162 [THz] = 221.458590 [cm-1]
freq ( 7) = 10.953491 [THz] = 365.369131 [cm-1]
freq ( 8) = 12.684841 [THz] = 423.120746 [cm-1]
freq ( 9) = 12.722708 [THz] = 424.383866 [cm-1]
freq ( 10) = 12.745234 [THz] = 425.135234 [cm-1]
freq ( 11) = 13.570613 [THz] = 452.666939 [cm-1]
freq ( 12) = 13.874216 [THz] = 462.794044 [cm-1]
**************************************************************************
Mode symmetry, D_2h (mmm) point group:
freq ( 1 - 1) = -1.3 [cm-1] --> B_3u I
freq ( 2 - 2) = -1.1 [cm-1] --> B_1u I
freq ( 3 - 3) = 0.9 [cm-1] --> B_2u I
freq ( 4 - 4) = 97.7 [cm-1] --> B_3u I
freq ( 5 - 5) = 188.1 [cm-1] --> B_3g R
freq ( 6 - 6) = 221.5 [cm-1] --> B_2g R
freq ( 7 - 7) = 365.4 [cm-1] --> A_g R
freq ( 8 - 8) = 423.1 [cm-1] --> A_u
freq ( 9 - 9) = 424.4 [cm-1] --> B_1g R
freq ( 10 - 10) = 425.1 [cm-1] --> B_2g R
freq ( 11 - 11) = 452.7 [cm-1] --> A_g R
freq ( 12 - 12) = 462.8 [cm-1] --> B_1u I
This results comes from Gamma point in several q point calculation.
q = ( 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.000000000 )
**************************************************************************
freq ( 1) = 0.294821 [THz] = 9.834157 [cm-1]
freq ( 2) = 0.531839 [THz] = 17.740255 [cm-1]
freq ( 3) = 0.538183 [THz] = 17.951848 [cm-1]
freq ( 4) = 2.934902 [THz] = 97.897792 [cm-1]
freq ( 5) = 5.651273 [THz] = 188.506166 [cm-1]
freq ( 6) = 6.641297 [THz] = 221.529834 [cm-1]
freq ( 7) = 10.953478 [THz] = 365.368700 [cm-1]
freq ( 8) = 12.689602 [THz] = 423.279546 [cm-1]
freq ( 9) = 12.724636 [THz] = 424.448167 [cm-1]
freq ( 10) = 12.750003 [THz] = 425.294313 [cm-1]
freq ( 11) = 13.570944 [THz] = 452.677974 [cm-1]
freq ( 12) = 13.879876 [THz] = 462.982823 [cm-1]
**************************************************************************
Mode symmetry, D_2h (mmm) point group:
freq ( 1 - 1) = 9.8 [cm-1] --> B_1u I
freq ( 2 - 2) = 17.7 [cm-1] --> B_3u I
freq ( 3 - 3) = 18.0 [cm-1] --> B_2u I
freq ( 4 - 4) = 97.9 [cm-1] --> B_2u I
freq ( 5 - 5) = 188.5 [cm-1] --> B_2g R
freq ( 6 - 6) = 221.5 [cm-1] --> B_3g R
freq ( 7 - 7) = 365.4 [cm-1] --> A_g R
freq ( 8 - 8) = 423.3 [cm-1] --> A_u
freq ( 9 - 9) = 424.4 [cm-1] --> B_1g R
freq ( 10 - 10) = 425.3 [cm-1] --> B_3g R
freq ( 11 - 11) = 452.7 [cm-1] --> A_g R
freq ( 12 - 12) = 463.0 [cm-1] --> B_1u I
Why these two parts are not same?
The structure I already optimised.
TW.
Department of Physics
Tohoku Unviersity
Email: wang1968000 at 163.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20191030/29877eaa/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list