[QE-users] band convergece problem in charged system
Leo Yang
121076797 at qq.com
Wed Oct 23 12:08:43 CEST 2019
Dear Thomas,
Thanks for your reply. I tried the neutral system before the charge one, which is simulated with Martyna-Tuckerman correction. The good thing is the band gap could achieve convergence in respect of super cell size. And I found that there is band gap between band 104 and 105 about 3.3 ev. But the occupation number of band 92-104 is fractional. The reason for that is there are lack of 4 electrons to occupy the band meanwhile I use smearing for the calculation. After adding 4 additional electrons to the system as I referred in the last email with the convergence size of supercell tested under neutral system (20 Angs), the band 92-104 are full occupation but decrease in band gap.
So I thing the reason leads my problem may be relative to "curvature" in vacuum space, which you mentioned before. If it is, do you have any solution for that? Thank you.
Best wishes
Yang
--------
Yang Zhou
PhD student
University of Leeds
United Kingdom
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Thomas Brumme"<thomas.brumme at uni-leipzig.de>;
Date: Tue, Oct 22, 2019 10:37 PM
To: "Quantum ESPRESSO users Forum"<users at lists.quantum-espresso.org>;"Leo Yang"<121076797 at qq.com>;
Subject: Re: [QE-users] band convergece problem in charged system
Dear Yang,
I have no clue how the Martyna-Tuckerman correction works but usually one
has problems with systems having such a large total charge since the total
cell needs to be neutral. Some terms are in fact calculated for a charge neutral
system resulting in a total potential which has a curvature as if there would be
a homogeneous background charge. This constant curvature leads to a
potential energy minimum in the vacuum space between the repeated cells.
If you increase the cell this minimum goes down in energy and, at some point,
crosses the Fermi energy and gets occupied.
Long story short:
I have no clue but are you sure that Martyna-Tuckerman correction works
correctly for charged systems?
Is the LUMO really a state of the molecule and not from a state in the vacuum?
You could check if everything works as intended for a neutral system...
Regards
Thomas
On 10/2/19 1:46 PM, Leo Yang wrote:
Dear QE users:
I try to use QE-6.4.1 to simulate as single molecule. The system is built in large super cell, and total_charge=-4 is added to input file leading to charged system. When I do the convergence test in term of the super cell size (20 Angs - 30 Angs ), the variation for total energy is small: -1038.6784 Ry for 20 Angs and 1038.7388 Ry for 30 Angs. But the band energy and Fermi energy (5.23 ev to 3.08 ev) shift visibly. The problem is that the band gap between band 104 (occupied) and 105 (unoccupied) become smaller with the increase of size (about 0.81 ev change to 0.11 ev). It seems the band gap is gradually disappear, which confuses me so much. The input file is attached with this email. It will be very appreciated if you can solve this for me. Thank you.
Best wishes
Yang Zhou
------
Yang Zhou
PhD student
University of Leeds
United Kingdom
_______________________________________________ Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso) users mailing list users at lists.quantum-espresso.org https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
-- Dr. rer. nat. Thomas Brumme Wilhelm-Ostwald-Institute for Physical and Theoretical Chemistry Leipzig University Phillipp-Rosenthal-Strasse 31 04103 Leipzig Tel: +49 (0)341 97 36456 email: thomas.brumme at uni-leipzig.de
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20191023/995096fc/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list