[QE-users] PBE + vdW or Grimme-D3
Giuseppe Mattioli
giuseppe.mattioli at ism.cnr.it
Sat Jun 8 12:21:03 CEST 2019
Dear Sohail
They are two main ways to simulate dispersion forces in QE. You may
look into the corresponding documentation, printed in the pw.x output
if you use one of them. VDWDF is actually a family of functionals in
which dispersion forces are calculated as a functional of the density.
They are not limited to pbe+vdw and there are several flavors
(c09-vdwdf, vdwdf2, also a hybrid c09-vdwdf-x functional, among
others). DFT-D2, D3, also D4 (not implemented in QE) are developed by
Stefan Grimme's group. They are rather a semiempirical contribution
added to the ab initio calculation in which correlation functionals
neglect long-range dispersion contributions. Let us add also rVV10,
XDM and TS to the families. rVV10 and TS are more or less similar to
the first two. XDM is pretty different. As *all of them* simulate the
same thing, all can in principle satisfy your needs. Hence you may 1)
use the setup someone else you trust used in publications or 2) make
yourself some tests by using layered unit cells to see what is the
best setup for your system.
HTH
Giuseppe
Quoting Sohail Ahmad <sohailphysics at yahoo.co.in>:
> Dear QE experts
> 1. May I know the difference between PBE+vdW and Grimme-D32.
> Which one is more suitable to study the effect of vdW in case of
> Transition metal dichalcogenide bi/tri/quad layer and why ?
> Best Wishes
> Sohail KKU, Abha, Saudi Arabia
GIUSEPPE MATTIOLI
CNR - ISTITUTO DI STRUTTURA DELLA MATERIA
Via Salaria Km 29,300 - C.P. 10
I-00015 - Monterotondo Scalo (RM)
Mob (*preferred*) +39 373 7305625
Tel + 39 06 90672342 - Fax +39 06 90672316
E-mail: <giuseppe.mattioli at ism.cnr.it>
More information about the users
mailing list