[QE-users] Relaxation of Fe2O3
Anuja Chanana
anujachanana26 at gmail.com
Sun Jul 28 18:07:41 CEST 2019
Dear users,
I am trying to relax the bulk structure of alpha-Fe2O3 in the rhombohedral
crystal structure. The ground state is +--+. However, the crystal lattice
doesn't relax and the total energy values keep fluctuating rather than
showing any convergence. The following is the input file
&CONTROL
calculation = 'vc-relax',
restart_mode = 'from_scratch',
title = 'Fe2O3',
prefix = 'Fe2O3',
outdir = './tmp_Fe2O3_rhom_scf_1',
pseudo_dir = '.',
forc_conv_thr = 1.0D-5,
tprnfor = .true.,
tstress = .true.
verbosity = 'high'
wf_collect = .true.,
nstep = 1000,
/
&SYSTEM
ibrav=5,
celldm(1)=10.2528224724d0, celldm(4)=0.5694631780d0,
nat=10,
ntyp=5,
ecutwfc = 80,
ecutrho = 640,
occupations='smearing'
smearing='fd'
degauss= 0.005,
nspin=2,
starting_magnetization(1)= 0.0,
starting_magnetization(2) = 1.0,
starting_magnetization(3) = -1.0,
starting_magnetization(4) = -1.0,
starting_magnetization(5) = 1.0,
lda_plus_u = .true.
Hubbard_U(2) = 3.8
Hubbard_U(3) = 3.8
Hubbard_U(4) = 3.8
Hubbard_U(5) = 3.8
/
&ELECTRONS
mixing_beta = 0.2,
conv_thr = 1.0D-6,
electron_maxstep=1000,
/
&ions
/
&cell
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
O 15.999400d0 O.pw91-n-rrkjus_psl.1.0.0.UPF
Fe1 55.845000d0 Fe.pw91-spn-rrkjus_psl.1.0.0.UPF
Fe2 55.845000d0 Fe.pw91-spn-rrkjus_psl.1.0.0.UPF
Fe3 55.845000d0 Fe.pw91-spn-rrkjus_psl.1.0.0.UPF
Fe4 55.845000d0 Fe.pw91-spn-rrkjus_psl.1.0.0.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS {crystal}
O 0.9444650930d0 0.5556659533d0 0.2500659533d0
O 0.2500650930d0 0.9444659533d0 0.5556659533d0
O 0.0557952789d0 0.4445978598d0 0.7501978598d0
O 0.4445952789d0 0.7501978598d0 0.0557978598d0
O 0.5556650930d0 0.2500659533d0 0.9444659533d0
O 0.7501952789d0 0.0557978598d0 0.4445978598d0
Fe1 0.1446976654d0 0.1446981632d0 0.1446981632d0
Fe2 0.6448278513d0 0.6448300697d0 0.6448300697d0
Fe3 0.3554325205d0 0.3554337433d0 0.3554337433d0
Fe4 0.8555627065d0 0.8555656499d0 0.8555656499d0
K_POINTS {automatic}
8 8 8 0 0 0
Has anyone ever tried relaxing the structure before and faced a similar
situation?
What is the best possible solution if the system doesn't show a smooth
convergence.
Looking forward to a reply.
Thanks and Regards
Anuja Chanana
[image: Mailtrack]
<https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality5&>
Sender
notified by
Mailtrack
<https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality5&>
07/28/19,
09:35:20 PM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20190728/ca4b4b7a/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list