[QE-users] Wrong prediction for Pd-Pd bond length
pboulet
pascal.boulet at univ-amu.fr
Mon Jan 28 17:30:40 CET 2019
As a supplement to Giuseppe’s and Lorenzo's comments:
1- forc_conv_thr should be smaller: about 1e-4 or 1e-5 (why using 1.94469e-03 with that many digits?)
2- add: etot_conv_thr= 1e-7
2- I would use ibrav=0 together with CELL-PARAMETERS (see online manual)
3- occupation=fixed, no smearing, and nbnd=number of occupied states+ a few virtual ones. It should work as you have a dimer.
4- why using vdW corrections? not sure they are significant. Furthermore, as a remember Grimme’s corrections are not that good for metals. I got too large bond distances for gold (but it was for a solid)…
5- mixing_beta=0.2 should do the job and you eventually avoid oscillations in the SCF convergence if you use a too large value (or even no convergence at all).
6- &CELL … / section is not necessary as you only optimise atomic positions.
7- K_POINTS {Gamma} is all right as you have a molecule (k-points are only meaningful for slabs and bulk structures)
HTH,
Best
Pascal Boulet
—
Professor in computational chemistry - DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY
Director of the Madirel laboratory
Aix-Marseille University - Avenue Escadrille Normandie Niemen - F-13013 Marseille - FRANCE
Tél: +33(0)4 13 55 18 19 - Fax : +33(0)4 13 55 18 50
Email : pascal.boulet at univ-amu.fr <mailto:pascal.boulet at univ-amu.fr>
> Le 28 janv. 2019 à 16:44, Paolo Costa <paolo.costa85 at gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> Dear QE users,
>
> I am trying to optimize (relax) Pd dimer (Pd2) as cluster placed on cubic lattice.
> However I got a value of Pd-Pd bond length which is far too long (3.36 A) compare to the experimental one (about 2.6 A).
> Am I doing something wrong? Here below the input file:
>
> &CONTROL
> calculation = "relax"
> prefix ='Pd2'
> forc_conv_thr = 1.94469e-03
> max_seconds = 1.34369e+14
> nstep = 800
> pseudo_dir = "/home/pcosta/pseudo"
> verbosity ='high'
> disk_io ='none'
> tprnfor = .TRUE.
> tstress = .TRUE.
> /
>
> &SYSTEM
> a = 4.50000e+01
> degauss = 1.00000e-02
> ecutrho = 1.83747e+01
> ecutwfc = 1.46997e+00
> lda_plus_u = .FALSE.
> ibrav = 1
> nat = 2
> nspin = 2
> ntyp = 1
> occupations = "smearing"
> smearing = "gaussian"
> starting_magnetization(1) = 2.00000e-01
> assume_isolated = 'makov-payne'
> vdw_corr = 'grimme-d3'
> /
>
> &ELECTRONS
> conv_thr = 1.00000e-08
> diagonalization = "david"
> electron_maxstep = 800
> mixing_beta = 4.00000e-01
> startingpot = "atomic"
> startingwfc = "atomic+random"
> /
>
> &IONS
> ion_dynamics = "bfgs"
> trust_radius_min=1e-5
> /
>
> &CELL
> cell_dofree = "all"
> cell_dynamics = "bfgs"
> press_conv_thr = 5.00000e-01
> /
>
> K_POINTS {automatic}
> 3 3 1 0 0 0
>
> ATOMIC_SPECIES
> Pd 106.42000 Pd.pbe-n-kjpaw_psl.1.0.0.UPF
>
> ATOMIC_POSITIONS {angstrom}
> Pd 16.194860 19.259990 18.659720
> Pd 18.251640 18.665930 18.594650
>
> Thanks.
> --
> Paolo Costa, Ph.D.
> Postdoctoral Researcher
> Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Sciences
> University of Ottawa
> 10 Marie Curie, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
> Room number: DRO 326 (D'Iorio Hall)
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.quantum-espresso.org
> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20190128/fc93eefe/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 1585 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20190128/fc93eefe/attachment.p7s>
More information about the users
mailing list