[QE-users] missing f orbital - Sm atom reg
Muthu V
muthu.physicsmath at gmail.com
Tue Aug 6 13:02:23 CEST 2019
Dear All,
i use Sm.pbe-spdn-rrkjus_psl.1.0.0.UPF, downloaded from QE web page, for my
system which contains Sm atoms.
the electronic configuration of Sm contains f orbitals and the
configuration is
*1s2 | 2s2 2p6 | 3s2 3p6 3d10 | 4s2 4p6 4d10 5s2 5p6 4f6 6s2*
when gone through this potential file i could see
Valence configuration:
nl pn l occ Rcut Rcut US E pseu
5S 1 0 2.00 1.400 1.700 -3.480513
6S 2 0 1.50 1.400 1.700 -0.320378
5P 2 1 6.00 1.400 1.800 -1.957179
6P 3 1 0.50 1.400 1.800 -0.119872
5D 3 2 1.00 1.400 2.000 -0.238636
Generation configuration:
5S 1 0 2.00 1.400 1.700 -3.480555
6S 2 0 1.50 1.400 1.700 -0.320387
5P 2 1 6.00 1.400 1.800 -1.957209
6P 3 1 0.50 1.400 1.800 -0.119877
5D 3 2 1.00 1.400 2.000 -0.238652
5D 3 2 0.00 1.400 2.000 2.000000
...
and
&input
title='Sm',
zed=62.0,
rel=1,
config='[Xe] 4f5.0 5d1.0 6s1.5 6p0.5',
iswitch=3,
dft='PBE'
/
...
when i did PDOS calculation, i do not see any f orbital contribution.
"Valence configuration:" and " Generation configuration: " and the
keyword "config" in &input card are different from each other. my
question is
whether electrons f orbitals are treated as core electron ? if yes the why
it is so ?
your explanation would be more help
best regards
Muthu Vallinayagam
PhD - student
HZDR, Germany
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20190806/ba8dcb57/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list