[QE-users] Ecutwfc and ecutrho
Stefano Baroni
baroni at sissa.it
Tue Sep 11 08:43:09 CEST 2018
The largest. SB
--
Stefano Baroni, Trieste -- swift message written and sent on the go
> On 11 Sep 2018, at 08:31, Carina Backtorp <carinabacktorp at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a question regarding how to choose ecutwfc and ecutrho.
> When I check the pseudopotentials, there is a recommendation of which ecutwfc and ecutrho to choose.
> However, they may differ a lot between different kinds of atoms. For example for
> Li.pbe-s-kjpaw_psl. 1.0.0.UPF and O.pbe-n-kjpaw_psl.1.0.0.UPF:
>
> Li : ecutwfc= 103 Ry, ecutrho = 410 Ry
> O : 47 Ry, ecutrho = 327 Ry.
>
> So, when I have a system where I have both Li and O atoms, how shall I think. I know that one should try it out,
> but still: how is the rule of thumb?
> Shall I go for the highest ecutwfc? And if so which ecutrho shall I use, as I understand it for the Oxygen the ecutrho needs to be 327/47 times higher than the ecutwfc. If I choose ecutwfc=103, shall I then use 103*327/47?
>
> Kind regards,
> Carina
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.quantum-espresso.org
> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20180911/831460b9/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list