[QE-users] Relax caculation not completed
Leonid Kahle
leonid.kahle at epfl.ch
Tue Oct 2 09:26:19 CEST 2018
Hello Gui,
Another reason your calculation take very long is your low *mixing_beta*
(ELECTRONS).
Is it really necessary? The smaller, the more robust, but the slower you
get to the electronic ground state.
Also, your *conv_thr* (ELECTRONS) is quite high, it might lead to a lot
of noise for the BFGS algorithm.
It's worth checking whether your forces have converged at that value,
and if not, make it tighter. Here in the lab we typically use 1e-11*nat.
It might make the overall time-to-solution for the ionic ground state
faster, and your result will be much more accurate.
Hope it was helpful,
Leonid
On 09/29/2018 05:43 AM, Gui Wei wrote:
> Hi,
> When I relax Fe(110)@Graphene system ( 2 iron layers, the bottom layer
> is fixed and 1 graphene layer), It took about 3 days on 12
> processors.And then I add a hydroxyl group and an epoxy group to the
> graphene (GO),when I try to relax Fe(110)@GO system ,10 days have
> passed,but the calculation has not completed.Is it a normal
> phenomenon? Can I speed up the calculation by adjusting the
> parameters?I put the latest structure in the attachment.
>
> &input
> &control
> calculation = 'relax',
> prefix='relax919',
> pseudo_dir = '/public/home/duan1/guiwei/QE/q-e-qe-6.3/pseudo/',
> outdir='/public/home/duan1/guiwei/QE/q-e-qe-6.3/tempdir/'
> tstress = .true.
> tprnfor = .true.
> etot_conv_thr=1.0D-4
> forc_conv_thr=1.0D-3
> /
> &system
> ibrav= 0,
> nat=127,
> ntyp=4,
> nspin = 2
> starting_magnetization(1) =0.4
> occupations='smearing',
> smearing='mp',
> degauss=0.02,
> ecutwfc =46.0
> ecutrho =240.0
> vdw_corr='DFT-D'
> london_s6 = 0.75
> /
> &electrons
> conv_thr = 1.0d-5
> mixing_beta = 0.1
> mixing_mode = 'local-TF'
> mixing_ndim=16
> electron_maxstep=200
> /
> &IONS
> ion_dynamics='bfgs'
> /
> CELL_PARAMETERS angstrom
> 19.67999 0.000000 0.000000
> 0.000000 8.521686 0.000000
> 0.000000 0.000000 17.00000
> ATOMIC_SPECIES
> Fe 55.847 Fe.pbe-n-kjpaw_psl.0.2.4.UPF
> C 12.0107 C.pbe-n-kjpaw_psl.0.1.UPF
> H 1.00 H.pbe-kjpaw.UPF
> O 16.00 O.pbe-kjpaw.UPF
> ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal
> ......
> K_POINTS automatic
> 2 2 1 0 0 0
>
> SCF cycles-energy
> 1-9767.89327
> 2-9768.09035
> 3-9768.21939
> 4-9768.29336
> 5-9768.3223
> 6-9768.34762
> 7-9768.35676
> 8-9768.36679
> 9-9768.37243
> 10-9768.37741
> 11-9768.38306
> 12-9768.38827
> 13-9768.39248
> 14-9768.39624
> 15-9768.39967
> 16-9768.40172
> 17-9768.40319
> 18-9768.40448
> 19-9768.40551
> 20-9768.40628
> 21-9768.40679
> 22-9768.4071
> 23-9768.40735
> 24-9768.40762
> 25-9768.40786
> 26-9768.4081
> 27-9768.40837
> 28-9768.40865
> 29-9768.409
> 30-9768.40946
> 31-9768.40995
> 32-9768.41052
> 33-9768.41119
> 34-9768.41209
> 35-9768.41307
> 36-9768.41367
> 37-9768.4144
> 38-9768.41472
> 39-9768.41506
> 40-9768.41546
> 41-9768.41586
> 42-9768.41613
> 43-9768.41647
> 44-9768.41681
> 45-9768.41705
> 46-9768.41728
> 47-9768.41754
> 48-9768.41781
>
>
> thanks
>
> Gui Wei
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users at lists.quantum-espresso.org
> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20181002/47b36ee7/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list