[Pw_forum] Could not find the mode symmetry after phonon frequency calculation of gamma point
Paolo Giannozzi
p.giannozzi at gmail.com
Mon Jan 8 08:45:40 CET 2018
Pseudopotentials do not affect symmetry. I would try to reduce the
convergence threshold for both the scf and the phonon calculation
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 5:16 AM, Sitangshu Bhattacharya <
sitangshu at iiita.ac.in> wrote:
> Dear Zhishuo,
>
> Check your scf report file. This same mode symmetry should be mentioned
> there. If it is there, replace with a proper pseudo. These things comes
> when pseudos are not well tested at the initial level.
>
> Regards,
> Sitangshu
>
> On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 9:59 PM, 黄志硕 <zhishuohuang at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear Quantum Espresso users,
>>
>>
>>
>> I just finished the phonon calculation at Gamma point of a material with
>> T_h symmetry. But it seems that the code could not determine the mode
>> symmetry as shown in the output file:
>>
>>
>>
>> ###############################################################
>>
>> Mode symmetry, T_h (m-3) point group:
>>
>>
>>
>> freq ( 1 - 3) = 9.1 [cm-1] --> T_u I
>>
>> freq ( 4 - 6) = 14.5 [cm-1] --> T_u I
>>
>> freq ( 7 - 9) = 48.9 [cm-1] --> T_g R
>>
>> freq ( 10 - 12) = 81.9 [cm-1] --> T_g R
>>
>> freq ( 13 - 15) = 100.1 [cm-1] --> T_u I
>>
>> freq ( 16 - 16) = 254.2 [cm-1] --> ?
>>
>> freq ( 17 - 17) = 254.2 [cm-1] --> ?
>>
>> freq ( 18 - 20) = 265.1 [cm-1] --> T_g R
>>
>> freq ( 21 - 23) = 347.7 [cm-1] --> T_u I
>>
>> freq ( 24 - 26) = 349.8 [cm-1] --> T_u I
>>
>> freq ( 27 - 27) = 350.5 [cm-1] --> A_u
>>
>> freq ( 28 - 28) = 394.8 [cm-1] --> ?
>>
>> freq ( 29 - 29) = 394.8 [cm-1] --> ?
>>
>> freq ( 30 - 32) = 395.2 [cm-1] --> T_u I
>>
>> freq ( 33 - 35) = 396.8 [cm-1] --> T_g R
>>
>> freq ( 36 - 36) = 398.8 [cm-1] --> ?
>>
>> freq ( 37 - 37) = 398.8 [cm-1] --> ?
>>
>> freq ( 38 - 40) = 479.4 [cm-1] --> T_g R
>>
>> …….
>>
>> …….
>>
>> ###############################################################
>>
>>
>>
>> As from above, the code could notice the point group is T_h. However, for
>> the two-fold modes (16 and 17, 28 and 29, 36 and 37, actually, all the
>> two-fold modes have the same problem), which seem to be E_g (or E_u) mode,
>> there is no symmetry information. In stead, there is only two “?” marks.
>>
>>
>>
>> Any hint for this problem could be very welcome.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Zhishuo Huang
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pw_forum mailing list
>> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
>> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>>
>
>
>
> --
> **********************************************
> Sitangshu Bhattacharya (সিতাংশু ভট্টাচার্য), Ph.D
> Assistant Professor,
> Room No. 2221, CC-1,
> Nanoscale Electro-Thermal Laboratory,
> Department of Electrical and Communication Engineering,
> Indian Institute of Information Technology-Allahabad
> Uttar Pradesh 211 012
> India
> Telephone: 91-532-2922000 Extn.: 2131
> Web-page: http://profile.iiita.ac.in/sitangshu/
> Institute: http://www.iiita.ac.in/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum at pwscf.org
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
>
--
Paolo Giannozzi, Dip. Scienze Matematiche Informatiche e Fisiche,
Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20180108/b4917d19/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list