[QE-users] Why does the difference between VASP and QE, even though they are BOMD theory
Venkataramana Imandi
venkataramana.imandi at gmail.com
Wed Apr 11 07:49:17 CEST 2018
Dear QE users,
Simulation cell parameters are same in the VASP and QE. In both cases,
simulation started from the same input structure.
I am using 6.2.1 version of QE.
QE: I used the BFGS for geometry optimization, Davidson diagonalization for
electronic scf and Pt(Pt.pbe-nd-rrkjus.UPF), O(O.pbe-rrkjus.UPF).
VASP: I used RMM-DIIS for geometry optimization, Davidson diagaonalization
or cg for electronic scf and Pt(PW91-ultrasoft), O(PW91-ultrasoft).
For information,
I obtained all O_ad(O-adsorption) sites(top,bridge,hcp and fcc) on
pt-surface in the VASP. In VASP, I found interlayer spacing(3rd and 2nd
layer difference) varied +0.02 to +0.03 angstroms compared to initial
structure.
But in QE, I obtained all O_ad sites except bridge site on Pt-surface.
In QE, I found interlayer spacing(3rd and 2nd layer difference) varied
>+0.05 angstroms more compared to initital structure.
Thus, I found more relaxed structure in QE compared to VASP.
Any suggestions are greatly appreciated.
My input file as follow.
&control
calculation='relax'
restart_mode='from_scratch',
pseudo_dir = '/home2/oth/ch18ipf01/pseudopotential2/',
prefix='pto'
tprnfor = .true.,
nstep = 200
/
&system
ibrav=0,
nat=49,
ntyp=2,
! nspin = 2,
! starting_magnetization(1)=0.7,
ecutwfc = 32.0,
ecutrho = 320.0,
occupations='smearing',
smearing='methfessel-paxton',
degauss=0.02
/
&electrons
diagonalization='cg'
conv_thr = 1.0e-6
mixing_beta = 0.3
electron_maxstep = 1000
/
&ions
ion_dynamics='bfgs',
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
Pt 195.084 Pt.pbe-nd-rrkjus.UPF
O 15.999 O.pbe-rrkjus.UPF
ATOMIC_POSITIONS {angstrom}
O 4.83670 3.24076 9.895064 1 1 1
Pt 7.7079 5.67952 7.91015 1 1 1
Pt 6.36297 8.19933 7.98784 1 1 1
Pt 4.91919 6.00109 8.19464 1 1 1
Pt 3.48056 8.20502 7.98339 1 1 1
Pt 2.13171 5.68297 7.90776 1 1 1
Pt 0.69985 8.11366 7.9477 1 1 1
Pt 7.78611 0.73129 7.94675 1 1 1
Pt 6.42371 3.08952 8.08857 1 1 1
Pt 4.92315 0.76409 7.92858 1 1 1
Pt 3.41889 3.09455 8.08213 1 1 1
Pt 2.05589 0.73846 7.94323 1 1 1
Pt 0.69979 3.32663 7.96547 1 1 1
Pt 6.29321 4.95311 5.73597 1 1 1
Pt 7.73513 7.49799 5.63702 1 1 1
Pt 3.54425 4.96152 5.72897 1 1 1
Pt 4.92162 7.32106 5.7753 1 1 1
Pt 0.69791 5.10582 5.63088 1 1 1
Pt 2.10707 7.50605 5.63432 1 1 1
Pt 6.32478 0.10848 5.63611 1 1 1
Pt 7.70985 2.61906 5.72581 1 1 1
Pt 3.51897 0.11648 5.63414 1 1 1
Pt 4.92144 2.53817 5.67277 1 1 1
Pt 0.69984 0.23217 5.59048 1 1 1
Pt 2.13138 2.62752 5.72184 1 1 1
Pt 6.32344 6.78474 3.44718 1 1 1
Pt 7.7339 9.3212 3.38713 1 1 1
Pt 3.51851 6.7929 3.44491 1 1 1
Pt 4.9219 9.19308 3.42498 1 1 1
Pt 0.6991 6.90045 3.3778 1 1 1
Pt 2.10972 9.32712 3.38533 1 1 1
Pt 6.33835 1.94543 3.42008 1 1 1
Pt 7.72421 4.42937 3.42142 1 1 1
Pt 3.50426 1.95276 3.41781 1 1 1
Pt 4.92063 4.34401 3.43929 1 1 1
Pt 0.6992 2.09004 3.40181 1 1 1
Pt 2.11503 4.43554 3.41785 1 1 1
Pt 7.73571 6.2569 1.1 0 0 0
Pt 6.32857 8.69414 1.1 0 0 0
Pt 4.92143 6.2569 1.1 0 0 0
Pt 3.51428 8.69414 1.1 0 0 0
Pt 2.10714 6.2569 1.1 0 0 0
Pt 0.7 8.69414 1.1 0 0 0
Pt 7.73571 1.38241 1.1 0 0 0
Pt 6.32857 3.81966 1.1 0 0 0
Pt 4.92143 1.38241 1.1 0 0 0
Pt 3.51428 3.81966 1.1 0 0 0
Pt 2.10714 1.38241 1.1 0 0 0
Pt 0.7 3.81966 1.1 0 0 0
K_POINTS {automatic}
2 2 1 0 0 0
CELL_PARAMETERS {angstrom}
8.4428549700000008 0.0000000000000000 0.0000000000000000
0.0000000000000000 9.7489691799999996 0.0000000000000000
0.0000000000000000 0.0000000000000000 19.1916000000000011
With best regards
Venkataramana Imandi
Postdoctoral fellow
IIT Madras, India.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20180411/52669832/attachment.html>
More information about the users
mailing list